[PATCH v3 00/10] Fix several DTB validation issues

[PATCH v3 00/10] Fix several DTB validation issues

[Diederik de Haas]

This patch set fixes several DTB validation issues and consists of 2
parts:
1) dsi refactoring
2) various low-hanging fruit

ad 1) The display/rockchip/rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi.yaml binding had:
- #address-cells
- #size-cells

My guess is that those properties were added for panel(s) which could
be connected. While convenient, it's not a property of the DSI
controller (in the SoC). And caused DTB validation issues when a panel
was not connected to the board. So add the #address/#size-cells
properties to the board dts[i] file where there is a panel and then
remove the properties from the SoC dtsi file ... and then from the
binding file as well.

ad 2) There were a number of issues which were obvious to me how to fix,
so I fixed those as well. One of those was the addition of port(s) or
endpoints, but for that the context (ie parent nodes) got redefined ...
to the same values they had in the SoC dsi node. The SoC dsi node
already defined the structure where each port got a label/phandle. That
allows for a simplification of the port/endpoint by referencing that
label/phandle.

My changes were based on yesterday's v6.17-armsoc/dts64 branch:
7f9509791507 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: add DTs for Firefly ROC-RK3588S-PC")

Then applied the following patches:
86491c2b99e5 ("dt-bindings: pinctrl: rockchip: increase max amount of device functions")
6f446bbe412a ("dt-bindings: gpu: mali-utgard: Add Rockchip RK3528 compatible")
ab9be0b75af5 ("dt-bindings: display: himax-hx8394: Add Huiling hl055fhav028c")
8358102806c6 ("dt-bindings: power: rockchip: Add support for RK3528")
233eda069994 ("dt-bindings: rockchip: pmu: Add compatible for RK3528")

And then validated it with W=1 using dtschema-2025.6.1.
The validation log file sizes:
- base: 99.9 KiB
- dsi: 82.2 KiB
- low-hanging-fruit: 69.0 KiB

I then checked whether dmesg wouldn't indicate problem on these boards:
- Rock64 (rk3328)
- RockPro64 (rk3399)
- PineTab2 (rk3566)

And I didn't find any. I don't have any px30 or rk3399-gru-* based
boards, so I couldn't test with those.

Changes in v2:
- Move refactoring of port/endpoint definition to its own patch
  (Quentin)
- Move re-ordering of nodes to its own patch (Quentin)
Link to v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20250627152645.740981-1-didi.debian@cknow.org/

Changes in v3:
- Fix syntax error in RP64 screen dtso (kernel test robot)
Link to v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20250628144915.839338-1-didi.debian@cknow.org/

I also identified some other items which could reduce the DTB
validation 'noise' substantially:

"failed to match any schema with compatible" errors:

- 'mps,mp8859': regulator/mp8859.txt
- 'realtek,rt5651': sound/rt5651.txt
- 'rockchip,rk3368-mailbox': mailbox/rockchip-mailbox.txt
- 'rockchip,rk3399-gru-sound': sound/rockchip,rk3399-gru-sound.txt
- 'ti,tsc2007': input/touchscreen/tsc2007.txt

Other issues where a (small?) fix may help a lot:

px30:
- /isp@ff4a0000/ports: graph node has single child node 'port@0',
    #address-cells/#size-cells are not necessary
- /syscon@ff140000/lvds/ports/port@0: graph node has single child node
    'endpoint@0', #address-cells/#size-cells are not necessary
- /dsi@ff450000/ports/port@0: graph node has single child node
    'endpoint@0', #address-cells/#size-cells are not necessary

rk3399:
- /usb@fe800000: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
- /usb@fe900000: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property

Cheers,
  Diederik

Diederik de Haas (10):
  arm64: dts: rockchip: Move dsi address+size-cells from SoC to px30
    boards
  arm64: dts: rockchip: Move dsi address+size-cells from SoC to rk3399
    boards
  dt-bindings: display: rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi: Drop address/size cells
  arm64: dts: rockchip: Simplify VOP port definition on rk3328
  arm64: dts: rockchip: Simplify edp endpoints on several rk3399 boards
  arm64: dts: rockchip: Simplify mipi_out endpoint on rk3399 RP64 dtso
  arm64: dts: rockchip: Move mipi_out node on rk3399 haikou demo dtso
  arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix LCD panel port on rk3566-pinetab2
  arm64: dts: rockchip: Drop unneeded address+size-cells on px30
  arm64: dts: rockchip: Drop regulator-compatible property on rk3399

 .../rockchip/rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi.yaml        |  6 -----
 .../rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk050h3146w-a2.dts   |  2 ++
 .../dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk050h3146w.dts  |  2 ++
 .../dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk050h3148w.dts  |  2 ++
 .../dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk500hd1829.dts  |  2 ++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-evb.dts     |  2 ++
 .../rockchip/px30-pp1516-ltk050h3146w-a2.dts  |  2 ++
 .../dts/rockchip/px30-pp1516-ltk050h3148w.dts |  2 ++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi        |  6 -----
 .../dts/rockchip/rk3326-anbernic-rg351m.dtsi  |  2 ++
 .../dts/rockchip/rk3326-gameforce-chi.dts     |  2 ++
 .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3326-odroid-go.dtsi   |  2 ++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi      |  6 +----
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi |  4 ----
 .../dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-chromebook.dtsi   | 15 ++++---------
 .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-scarlet.dtsi |  4 +++-
 .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-hugsun-x99.dts   |  2 --
 .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinebook-pro.dts | 15 ++++---------
 .../dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts     |  2 ++
 .../rk3399-puma-haikou-video-demo.dtso        | 12 +++++-----
 .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-4c-plus.dts |  2 --
 .../dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64-screen.dtso | 22 ++++++-------------
 .../rockchip/rk3399-sapphire-excavator.dts    | 16 ++++----------
 .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3566-pinetab2.dtsi    |  6 ++---
 24 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)

-- 
2.50.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

[PATCH v3 01/10] arm64: dts: rockchip: Move dsi address+size-cells from SoC to px30 boards

[Diederik de Haas]

The #address-cells and #size-cells properties are not useful on the DSI
controller node; they are only useful/required on ports and panel(s).
So remove them from the controller node and add them where actually
needed on the various px30 based boards, which includes rk3326.

This fixes the following DTB validation warnings:

  unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges",
  "dma-ranges" or child "reg" property

Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk050h3146w-a2.dts  | 2 ++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk050h3146w.dts     | 2 ++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk050h3148w.dts     | 2 ++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk500hd1829.dts     | 2 ++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-evb.dts                    | 2 ++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-pp1516-ltk050h3146w-a2.dts | 2 ++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-pp1516-ltk050h3148w.dts    | 2 ++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi                       | 2 --
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3326-anbernic-rg351m.dtsi     | 2 ++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3326-gameforce-chi.dts        | 2 ++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3326-odroid-go.dtsi           | 2 ++
 11 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk050h3146w-a2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk050h3146w-a2.dts
index 1d26164be7b8..a31c61c8f148 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk050h3146w-a2.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk050h3146w-a2.dts
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ / {
 };
 
 &dsi {
+	#address-cells = <1>;
+	#size-cells = <0>;
 	status = "okay";
 
 	panel@0 {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk050h3146w.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk050h3146w.dts
index 82c6acdb4fae..a3c6edfdb37c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk050h3146w.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk050h3146w.dts
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ / {
 };
 
 &dsi {
+	#address-cells = <1>;
+	#size-cells = <0>;
 	status = "okay";
 
 	panel@0 {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk050h3148w.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk050h3148w.dts
index 94449132df38..9b5eff392dfa 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk050h3148w.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk050h3148w.dts
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ / {
 };
 
 &dsi {
+	#address-cells = <1>;
+	#size-cells = <0>;
 	status = "okay";
 
 	panel@0 {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk500hd1829.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk500hd1829.dts
index d7b639e7ccab..36b7cae49e31 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk500hd1829.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-cobra-ltk500hd1829.dts
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ aliases {
 };
 
 &dsi {
+	#address-cells = <1>;
+	#size-cells = <0>;
 	status = "okay";
 
 	panel@0 {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-evb.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-evb.dts
index bfd724b73c9a..85d1642eb9be 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-evb.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-evb.dts
@@ -124,6 +124,8 @@ &display_subsystem {
 };
 
 &dsi {
+	#address-cells = <1>;
+	#size-cells = <0>;
 	status = "okay";
 
 	ports {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-pp1516-ltk050h3146w-a2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-pp1516-ltk050h3146w-a2.dts
index b71929bcb33e..932721ffd470 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-pp1516-ltk050h3146w-a2.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-pp1516-ltk050h3146w-a2.dts
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ / {
 };
 
 &dsi {
+	#address-cells = <1>;
+	#size-cells = <0>;
 	status = "okay";
 
 	panel@0 {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-pp1516-ltk050h3148w.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-pp1516-ltk050h3148w.dts
index a9bd5936c701..70adf091371c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-pp1516-ltk050h3148w.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-pp1516-ltk050h3148w.dts
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ / {
 };
 
 &dsi {
+	#address-cells = <1>;
+	#size-cells = <0>;
 	status = "okay";
 
 	panel@0 {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi
index 0cad83c5d5fe..5034ad8019a8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi
@@ -1137,8 +1137,6 @@ dsi: dsi@ff450000 {
 		resets = <&cru SRST_MIPIDSI_HOST_P>;
 		reset-names = "apb";
 		rockchip,grf = <&grf>;
-		#address-cells = <1>;
-		#size-cells = <0>;
 		status = "disabled";
 
 		ports {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3326-anbernic-rg351m.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3326-anbernic-rg351m.dtsi
index 150fadcb0b3c..54395a40b087 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3326-anbernic-rg351m.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3326-anbernic-rg351m.dtsi
@@ -118,6 +118,8 @@ &display_subsystem {
 };
 
 &dsi {
+	#address-cells = <1>;
+	#size-cells = <0>;
 	status = "okay";
 
 	ports {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3326-gameforce-chi.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3326-gameforce-chi.dts
index 10e6ab724ac4..4d306085646c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3326-gameforce-chi.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3326-gameforce-chi.dts
@@ -322,6 +322,8 @@ &display_subsystem {
 };
 
 &dsi {
+	#address-cells = <1>;
+	#size-cells = <0>;
 	status = "okay";
 
 	internal_display: panel@0 {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3326-odroid-go.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3326-odroid-go.dtsi
index 446a1a6c12e7..bf4554eff47d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3326-odroid-go.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3326-odroid-go.dtsi
@@ -220,6 +220,8 @@ &display_subsystem {
 };
 
 &dsi {
+	#address-cells = <1>;
+	#size-cells = <0>;
 	status = "okay";
 
 	ports {
-- 
2.50.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

[PATCH v3 02/10] arm64: dts: rockchip: Move dsi address+size-cells from SoC to rk3399 boards

[Diederik de Haas]

The #address-cells and #size-cells properties are not useful on the DSI
controller node; they are only useful/required on ports and panel(s).
So remove them from the controller node and add them where actually
needed on the various rk3399 based boards.

This fixes the following DTB validation warnings:

  unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges",
  "dma-ranges" or child "reg" property

Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi             | 4 ----
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-scarlet.dtsi      | 4 +++-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts     | 2 ++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64-screen.dtso | 3 +--
 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi
index 9d5f5b083e3c..4dcceb9136b7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi
@@ -2071,8 +2071,6 @@ mipi_dsi: dsi@ff960000 {
 		resets = <&cru SRST_P_MIPI_DSI0>;
 		reset-names = "apb";
 		rockchip,grf = <&grf>;
-		#address-cells = <1>;
-		#size-cells = <0>;
 		status = "disabled";
 
 		ports {
@@ -2112,8 +2110,6 @@ mipi_dsi1: dsi@ff968000 {
 		resets = <&cru SRST_P_MIPI_DSI1>;
 		reset-names = "apb";
 		rockchip,grf = <&grf>;
-		#address-cells = <1>;
-		#size-cells = <0>;
 		#phy-cells = <0>;
 		status = "disabled";
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-scarlet.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-scarlet.dtsi
index 5e068377a0a2..6aaaf0f7f73f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-scarlet.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-scarlet.dtsi
@@ -627,8 +627,10 @@ &mipi_dphy_rx0 {
 };
 
 &mipi_dsi {
-	status = "okay";
 	clock-master;
+	#address-cells = <1>;
+	#size-cells = <0>;
+	status = "okay";
 
 	ports {
 		mipi_out: port@1 {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts
index 909ed14035f7..fe32937a2d16 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts
@@ -464,6 +464,8 @@ &io_domains {
 
 &mipi_dsi {
 	clock-master;
+	#address-cells = <1>;
+	#size-cells = <0>;
 	status = "okay";
 
 	panel@0 {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64-screen.dtso b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64-screen.dtso
index b1f4ab22b99c..a26c8e05c13b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64-screen.dtso
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64-screen.dtso
@@ -47,10 +47,9 @@ touch: touchscreen@5d {
 };
 
 &mipi_dsi {
+	clock-master;
 	#address-cells = <1>;
 	#size-cells = <0>;
-
-	clock-master;
 	status = "okay";
 
 	ports {
-- 
2.50.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

[PATCH v3 03/10] dt-bindings: display: rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi: Drop address/size cells

[Diederik de Haas]

When the dw-mipi-dsi binding was initially added in commit
a20d86e7f964 ("Documentation: dt-bindings: Add bindings for rk3288 DW MIPI DSI driver")
the #address-cells and #size-cells were added as required properties.

When the binding was converted to yaml format in commit
0dac2102cf6b ("dt-bindings: display: rockchip: convert dw_mipi_dsi_rockchip.txt to yaml")
those properties were demoted to optional and removed from the binding
example.

As for the compatibles:
- rockchip,px30-mipi-dsi      removed in this patch set
- rockchip,rk3128-mipi-dsi    never used
- rockchip,rk3288-mipi-dsi    added (invalid); later removed [1]
- rockchip,rk3399-mipi-dsi    removed in this patch set
- rockchip,rk3568-mipi-dsi    never used
- rockchip,rv1126-mipi-dsi    proposed (invalid); never accepted [2]

[1] 282e2e078ba5 ("ARM: dts: rockchip: Remove #address/#size-cells from rk3288 mipi_dsi")
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230731110012.2913742-12-jagan@edgeble.ai/

The #address-cells and #size-cells are useful (and required) in the
ports node and for panel(s), but those properties are declared in their
schemas already. Now that there are no remaining users, remove these
properties from the Rockchip specific extensions of the Synopsys
DesignWare MIPI DSI host controller.

Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
---
 .../bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi.yaml     | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi.yaml
index ccd71c5324af..0881e82deb11 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi.yaml
@@ -58,12 +58,6 @@ properties:
   power-domains:
     maxItems: 1
 
-  "#address-cells":
-    const: 1
-
-  "#size-cells":
-    const: 0
-
 required:
   - compatible
   - clocks
-- 
2.50.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

[PATCH v3 04/10] arm64: dts: rockchip: Simplify VOP port definition on rk3328

[Diederik de Haas]

When there's only 1 endpoint, there is no need for a unit-address and
removing that allows removing of related properties as well.

This fixes the following DTB validation warnings:

  graph node has single child node 'endpoint@0',
  #address-cells/#size-cells are not necessary

Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi | 6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi
index 7d992c3c01ce..6438c969f9d7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3328.dtsi
@@ -731,11 +731,7 @@ vop: vop@ff370000 {
 		status = "disabled";
 
 		vop_out: port {
-			#address-cells = <1>;
-			#size-cells = <0>;
-
-			vop_out_hdmi: endpoint@0 {
-				reg = <0>;
+			vop_out_hdmi: endpoint {
 				remote-endpoint = <&hdmi_in_vop>;
 			};
 		};
-- 
2.50.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

[PATCH v3 05/10] arm64: dts: rockchip: Simplify edp endpoints on several rk3399 boards

[Diederik de Haas]

The only thing actually added here is a single endpoint on edp_out,
which is already defined in rk3399-base.dtsi, so it's simpler to just
reference that phandle, which allows the removal of several properties.

This fixes the following DTB validation warnings:

  graph node has single child node 'endpoint@0',
  #address-cells/#size-cells are not necessary

Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
---
 .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-chromebook.dtsi | 15 ++++-----------
 .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinebook-pro.dts    | 15 ++++-----------
 .../dts/rockchip/rk3399-sapphire-excavator.dts   | 16 ++++------------
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-chromebook.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-chromebook.dtsi
index a9ea4b0daa04..9d07353df52c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-chromebook.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-chromebook.dtsi
@@ -250,18 +250,11 @@ &edp {
 	 */
 	assigned-clocks = <&cru PCLK_EDP>;
 	assigned-clock-rates = <24000000>;
+};
 
-	ports {
-		edp_out: port@1 {
-			reg = <1>;
-			#address-cells = <1>;
-			#size-cells = <0>;
-
-			edp_out_panel: endpoint@0 {
-				reg = <0>;
-				remote-endpoint = <&panel_in_edp>;
-			};
-		};
+&edp_out {
+	edp_out_panel: endpoint {
+		remote-endpoint = <&panel_in_edp>;
 	};
 };
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinebook-pro.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinebook-pro.dts
index 5473070823cb..5a8551d9ffe4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinebook-pro.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinebook-pro.dts
@@ -404,18 +404,11 @@ &edp {
 	pinctrl-names = "default";
 	pinctrl-0 = <&edp_hpd>;
 	status = "okay";
+};
 
-	ports {
-		edp_out: port@1 {
-			reg = <1>;
-			#address-cells = <1>;
-			#size-cells = <0>;
-
-			edp_out_panel: endpoint@0 {
-				reg = <0>;
-				remote-endpoint = <&panel_in_edp>;
-			};
-		};
+&edp_out {
+	edp_out_panel: endpoint {
+		remote-endpoint = <&panel_in_edp>;
 	};
 };
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-sapphire-excavator.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-sapphire-excavator.dts
index fdaa8472b7a7..a4ceafe6dd7a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-sapphire-excavator.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-sapphire-excavator.dts
@@ -142,21 +142,13 @@ sdio_pwrseq: sdio-pwrseq {
 
 &edp {
 	status = "okay";
+};
 
-	ports {
-		edp_out: port@1 {
-			reg = <1>;
-			#address-cells = <1>;
-			#size-cells = <0>;
-
-			edp_out_panel: endpoint@0 {
-				reg = <0>;
-				remote-endpoint = <&panel_in_edp>;
-			};
-		};
+&edp_out {
+	edp_out_panel: endpoint {
+		remote-endpoint = <&panel_in_edp>;
 	};
 };
-
 &i2c1 {
 	i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <300>;
 	i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <15>;
-- 
2.50.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

[PATCH v3 06/10] arm64: dts: rockchip: Simplify mipi_out endpoint on rk3399 RP64 dtso

[Diederik de Haas]

The only thing actually added here is a single endpoint on mipi_out,
which is already defined in rk3399-base.dtsi, so it's simpler to just
reference that phandle, which allows the removal of several properties.

Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
---
 .../dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64-screen.dtso | 19 ++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64-screen.dtso b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64-screen.dtso
index a26c8e05c13b..dabe535f2111 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64-screen.dtso
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rockpro64-screen.dtso
@@ -52,19 +52,6 @@ &mipi_dsi {
 	#size-cells = <0>;
 	status = "okay";
 
-	ports {
-		#address-cells = <1>;
-		#size-cells = <0>;
-
-		mipi_out: port@1 {
-			reg = <1>;
-
-			mipi_out_panel: endpoint {
-				remote-endpoint = <&mipi_in_panel>;
-			};
-		};
-	};
-
 	mipi_panel: panel@0 {
 		compatible = "feiyang,fy07024di26a30d";
 		reg = <0>;
@@ -80,6 +67,12 @@ mipi_in_panel: endpoint {
 	};
 };
 
+&mipi_out {
+	mipi_out_panel: endpoint {
+		remote-endpoint = <&mipi_in_panel>;
+	};
+};
+
 &pwm0 {
 	status = "okay";
 };
-- 
2.50.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

[PATCH v3 07/10] arm64: dts: rockchip: Move mipi_out node on rk3399 haikou demo dtso

[Diederik de Haas]

According to the DTS coding style [1] referenced nodes should be sorted
alpha-numerically so move mipi_out to be after mipi_in_panel.

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.html#order-of-nodes

Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
---
 .../dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma-haikou-video-demo.dtso  | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma-haikou-video-demo.dtso b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma-haikou-video-demo.dtso
index 0377ec860d35..d28880b8dd44 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma-haikou-video-demo.dtso
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-puma-haikou-video-demo.dtso
@@ -124,12 +124,6 @@ pca9670: gpio@27 {
 	};
 };
 
-&mipi_out {
-	mipi_out_panel: endpoint {
-		remote-endpoint = <&mipi_in_panel>;
-	};
-};
-
 &mipi_dsi {
 	#address-cells = <1>;
 	#size-cells = <0>;
@@ -151,6 +145,12 @@ mipi_in_panel: endpoint {
 	};
 };
 
+&mipi_out {
+	mipi_out_panel: endpoint {
+		remote-endpoint = <&mipi_in_panel>;
+	};
+};
+
 &pinctrl {
 	pca9670 {
 		pca9670_resetn: pca9670-resetn {
-- 
2.50.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

[PATCH v3 08/10] arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix LCD panel port on rk3566-pinetab2

[Diederik de Haas]

The MIPI DSI connector on the PineTab2 only has 1 port with 1 endpoint,
so drop the unit-address properties.

While at it, move 'rotation' property to its proper sorting position.

This fixes the following DTB validation warnings:

  node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property

Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3566-pinetab2.dtsi | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3566-pinetab2.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3566-pinetab2.dtsi
index 3473b1eef5cd..d0e38412d56a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3566-pinetab2.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3566-pinetab2.dtsi
@@ -282,11 +282,11 @@ lcd: panel@0 {
 		reg = <0>;
 		backlight = <&backlight>;
 		enable-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PC7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
-		rotation = <90>;
 		power-supply = <&vcc_3v3>;
+		rotation = <90>;
 
-		port@0 {
-			panel_in_dsi: endpoint@0 {
+		port {
+			panel_in_dsi: endpoint {
 				remote-endpoint = <&dsi0_out_con>;
 			};
 		};
-- 
2.50.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

[PATCH v3 09/10] arm64: dts: rockchip: Drop unneeded address+size-cells on px30

[Diederik de Haas]

On nodes with compatible "rockchip,px30-usb2phy-grf", the #address-cells
and #size-cells are required and consequently their child nodes should
have unit addresses. That is not the case for the px30-pmugrf and
px30-grf nodes, so remove them there.

This fixes the following DTB validation warnings:

  unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges",
  "dma-ranges" or child "reg" property

Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi
index 5034ad8019a8..46f64cd33b9b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi
@@ -351,8 +351,6 @@ power-domain@PX30_PD_GPU {
 	pmugrf: syscon@ff010000 {
 		compatible = "rockchip,px30-pmugrf", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
 		reg = <0x0 0xff010000 0x0 0x1000>;
-		#address-cells = <1>;
-		#size-cells = <1>;
 
 		pmu_io_domains: io-domains {
 			compatible = "rockchip,px30-pmu-io-voltage-domain";
@@ -453,8 +451,6 @@ gic: interrupt-controller@ff131000 {
 	grf: syscon@ff140000 {
 		compatible = "rockchip,px30-grf", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
 		reg = <0x0 0xff140000 0x0 0x1000>;
-		#address-cells = <1>;
-		#size-cells = <1>;
 
 		io_domains: io-domains {
 			compatible = "rockchip,px30-io-voltage-domain";
-- 
2.50.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

[PATCH v3 10/10] arm64: dts: rockchip: Drop regulator-compatible property on rk3399

[Diederik de Haas]

The regulator-compatible property has never existed in the
regulator/fcs,fan53555.yaml binding, so drop it.

This fixes the following DTB validation warnings:

  Unevaluated properties are not allowed
  ('regulator-compatible' was unexpected)

Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-hugsun-x99.dts   | 2 --
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-4c-plus.dts | 2 --
 2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-hugsun-x99.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-hugsun-x99.dts
index 81c4fcb30f39..352c8efb37e0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-hugsun-x99.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-hugsun-x99.dts
@@ -211,7 +211,6 @@ &i2c0 {
 	vdd_cpu_b: syr827@40 {
 		compatible = "silergy,syr827";
 		reg = <0x40>;
-		regulator-compatible = "fan53555-reg";
 		pinctrl-0 = <&vsel1_pin>;
 		regulator-name = "vdd_cpu_b";
 		regulator-min-microvolt = <712500>;
@@ -229,7 +228,6 @@ regulator-state-mem {
 	vdd_gpu: syr828@41 {
 		compatible = "silergy,syr828";
 		reg = <0x41>;
-		regulator-compatible = "fan53555-reg";
 		pinctrl-0 = <&vsel2_pin>;
 		regulator-name = "vdd_gpu";
 		regulator-min-microvolt = <712500>;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-4c-plus.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-4c-plus.dts
index 15da5c80d25d..962b8b231c96 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-4c-plus.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock-4c-plus.dts
@@ -421,7 +421,6 @@ vdd_cpu_b: regulator@40 {
 		compatible = "silergy,syr827";
 		reg = <0x40>;
 		fcs,suspend-voltage-selector = <1>;
-		regulator-compatible = "fan53555-reg";
 		pinctrl-0 = <&vsel1_gpio>;
 		vsel-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PC1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
 		regulator-name = "vdd_cpu_b";
@@ -440,7 +439,6 @@ vdd_gpu: regulator@41 {
 		compatible = "silergy,syr828";
 		reg = <0x41>;
 		fcs,suspend-voltage-selector = <1>;
-		regulator-compatible = "fan53555-reg";
 		pinctrl-0 = <&vsel2_gpio>;
 		vsel-gpios = <&gpio1 RK_PB6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
 		regulator-name = "vdd_gpu";
-- 
2.50.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] dt-bindings: display: rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi: Drop address/size cells

[Rob Herring]

On Sun, Jun 29, 2025 at 02:34:44PM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> When the dw-mipi-dsi binding was initially added in commit
> a20d86e7f964 ("Documentation: dt-bindings: Add bindings for rk3288 DW MIPI DSI driver")
> the #address-cells and #size-cells were added as required properties.
> 
> When the binding was converted to yaml format in commit
> 0dac2102cf6b ("dt-bindings: display: rockchip: convert dw_mipi_dsi_rockchip.txt to yaml")
> those properties were demoted to optional and removed from the binding
> example.
> 
> As for the compatibles:
> - rockchip,px30-mipi-dsi      removed in this patch set
> - rockchip,rk3128-mipi-dsi    never used
> - rockchip,rk3288-mipi-dsi    added (invalid); later removed [1]
> - rockchip,rk3399-mipi-dsi    removed in this patch set
> - rockchip,rk3568-mipi-dsi    never used
> - rockchip,rv1126-mipi-dsi    proposed (invalid); never accepted [2]
> 
> [1] 282e2e078ba5 ("ARM: dts: rockchip: Remove #address/#size-cells from rk3288 mipi_dsi")
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230731110012.2913742-12-jagan@edgeble.ai/
> 
> The #address-cells and #size-cells are useful (and required) in the
> ports node and for panel(s), but those properties are declared in their
> schemas already. Now that there are no remaining users, remove these
> properties from the Rockchip specific extensions of the Synopsys
> DesignWare MIPI DSI host controller.

The change is fine, but your reasoning is flawed. These properties are 
used if you define DSI devices on the "DSI bus" where the address of the 
child devices are the DSI virtual channel. Often though that's just 0 
and not really used, so you don't need it. 

The change is fine because these properties are defined in 
dsi-controller.yaml, so specifying them here is redundant.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
> ---
>  .../bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi.yaml     | 6 ------
>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi.yaml
> index ccd71c5324af..0881e82deb11 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi.yaml
> @@ -58,12 +58,6 @@ properties:
>    power-domains:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
> -  "#address-cells":
> -    const: 1
> -
> -  "#size-cells":
> -    const: 0
> -
>  required:
>    - compatible
>    - clocks
> -- 
> 2.50.0
> 

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] dt-bindings: display: rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi: Drop address/size cells

[Diederik de Haas]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2841 bytes --]

On Tue Jul 8, 2025 at 5:47 PM CEST, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2025 at 02:34:44PM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
>> When the dw-mipi-dsi binding was initially added in commit
>> a20d86e7f964 ("Documentation: dt-bindings: Add bindings for rk3288 DW MIPI DSI driver")
>> the #address-cells and #size-cells were added as required properties.
>> 
>> When the binding was converted to yaml format in commit
>> 0dac2102cf6b ("dt-bindings: display: rockchip: convert dw_mipi_dsi_rockchip.txt to yaml")
>> those properties were demoted to optional and removed from the binding
>> example.
>> 
>> As for the compatibles:
>> - rockchip,px30-mipi-dsi      removed in this patch set
>> - rockchip,rk3128-mipi-dsi    never used
>> - rockchip,rk3288-mipi-dsi    added (invalid); later removed [1]
>> - rockchip,rk3399-mipi-dsi    removed in this patch set
>> - rockchip,rk3568-mipi-dsi    never used
>> - rockchip,rv1126-mipi-dsi    proposed (invalid); never accepted [2]
>> 
>> [1] 282e2e078ba5 ("ARM: dts: rockchip: Remove #address/#size-cells from rk3288 mipi_dsi")
>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230731110012.2913742-12-jagan@edgeble.ai/
>> 
>> The #address-cells and #size-cells are useful (and required) in the
>> ports node and for panel(s), but those properties are declared in their
>> schemas already. Now that there are no remaining users, remove these
>> properties from the Rockchip specific extensions of the Synopsys
>> DesignWare MIPI DSI host controller.
>
> The change is fine, but your reasoning is flawed. These properties are 
> used if you define DSI devices on the "DSI bus" where the address of the 
> child devices are the DSI virtual channel. Often though that's just 0 
> and not really used, so you don't need it. 

Thanks for the explanation :-)

> The change is fine because these properties are defined in 
> dsi-controller.yaml, so specifying them here is redundant.

Indeed. Will fix in the next version.

Cheers,
  Diederik

>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
>> ---
>>  .../bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi.yaml     | 6 ------
>>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi.yaml
>> index ccd71c5324af..0881e82deb11 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,dw-mipi-dsi.yaml
>> @@ -58,12 +58,6 @@ properties:
>>    power-domains:
>>      maxItems: 1
>>  
>> -  "#address-cells":
>> -    const: 1
>> -
>> -  "#size-cells":
>> -    const: 0
>> -
>>  required:
>>    - compatible
>>    - clocks
>> -- 
>> 2.50.0
>> 


[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 170 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip