From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA272E63F15 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2026 17:21:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:References:From:Subject:Cc: To:Message-Id:Date:Mime-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=l5SeW/DlUojxsq0aTwwRf73mq9hdc+FHfGO14aZUO1U=; b=sKcZwHzbPjw8DL euklboswenP4mLjhzwsHYiWcasa2Z/k3WDGUfoX/al1vd3+QrOcFjuLnrs/rXUL3kzf3fgRnxZXB8 GMMxfShTeG2OltKI796jxEGed9IrqHk6yH8Ug+sLre7Dw06LXvtS/6kFaQ0Upph8xaFu8jND6oEJO LGgQKYlKdOBjPh8wQ3aWtEmtNSPrZzKZgzy5Sx4li0gDskiloeSVQodnjTBHGKld4N4+ZUyQh8sza OSdghI2Z0UjJFhEBTVRcXxse9VppsWTx6WL71SZwGC33dWn2j6/+rObAxBHEuVgDl2jk8Jo3S35J/ yG9tZl24RU4rRsRJiMUA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vs2Hl-000000075hC-1P2p; Mon, 16 Feb 2026 17:21:25 +0000 Received: from out-173.mta0.migadu.com ([91.218.175.173]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vs2Hh-000000075g9-3D6p; Mon, 16 Feb 2026 17:21:23 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cknow-tech.com; s=key1; t=1771262476; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bT2fiqRkjI9axK4fJtClgUV/TJc6YLz7YhqPHByH0kk=; b=cjOgiwYl2zixY+bjimSYCRXIK8VH45q1zpZ1bCPWBn6AL3obFgYyxLF/iACRf63TTAktFJ AEPwW/vgIDKy/zZwcOJ8dAr9pFBaV7VzA5IMFMD02K3WfN2dAHj8VDBdyzAVYBwdwFv896 xbeNmH0OqheYp6HHoLu25WAtADiCWSZOj/ajeIZyJt4H85EYm1UzPuGfk6pe+Bl+TcSk/t h1JmbrHDLXfjIeoKWwFmhoJmcf/yF7TtQCAdk4+u5+joiz80eZ1Qnm2FmwfVcVHRpPALy6 R06ZFyGXSo09DlUZpFifiVeEfgTcum63vNhsQldwCRxfARIGMEDAncFyEq5m8Q== Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 18:21:13 +0100 Message-Id: To: "Russell King (Oracle)" , "Andrew Lunn" Cc: "Yao Zi" , "Heiko Stuebner" , "Heiner Kallweit" , "David S. Miller" , "Eric Dumazet" , "Jakub Kicinski" , "Paolo Abeni" , "Rob Herring" , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , "Conor Dooley" , , , , Subject: Re: Problematic understanding of phy-mode in Rockchip DWMAC driver X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: "Diederik de Haas" References: In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260216_092122_440711_5173E430 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.45 ) X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon Feb 16, 2026 at 4:00 PM CET, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 02:57:48AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 14, 2026 at 07:02:08PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: >> > On Sat, Feb 14, 2026 at 05:50:15PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: >> > > Rockchip have recently started adding support for a new version, and >> > > appear to of listened to what we have been saying. So it could be the >> > > next generation of chips get this correct. >> > >> > Have you seen any proposed code from Rockchip for their new scheme? >> >> There was a patch, including a rather odd formulae to convert register >> value to delay. I gave some feedback, but it has been silence >> afterwards. > > Searching lore's netdev archive doesn't seem to bring anything up. https://patch.msgid.link/b25d6eb2-e105-4060-86fa-c1a06396ca92@lunn.ch/ _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip