From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D73C1C282D1 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 16:04:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=OLOSaUEj9zbkFpVYDxbFxEqyo9FqsLTGPzLNyDlRPhY=; b=DqdGc6zX1CS8t2 U6O5DOMmeUPdX5/UFn+zSWnT7Ug/4tBRPCKzKaVTR/b0H71DWwY1VzbmDRIPgrFdEywYOgaQHwKKK 6d5amSdI68ntIKL5rY2qQAm3mNiwbKxs637nRLE9yqqO73QaXCt3Qf80Ksc33Yn8z8mKWWon+pwzv e1DHQPqjRLrRppDYDp0UWcQrcuRhyKhxN/icckVaAyZJhnVZqC5+t863MASRKZ14nBhtXpV1cv4rA 9jJ+ojAnHV5WLr/Cg0mZor1vLBTCBKZATgTactDV3tEOOWAWEd7sRCG/EflEB9eDbZfWyQjy7jazD EKX1PI0YgK8Xoh1cC21g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tqDhY-0000000BPjF-10V0; Thu, 06 Mar 2025 16:04:00 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tqCci-0000000BFsT-3dE3; Thu, 06 Mar 2025 14:54:58 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B15B1007; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 06:55:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from bogus (e133711.arm.com [10.1.196.55]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C57E93F66E; Thu, 6 Mar 2025 06:54:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 14:54:50 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Chukun Pan Cc: Heiko Stuebner , Yao Zi , Sudeep Holla , Rob Herring , Conor Dooley , Krzysztof Kozlowski , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: dts: rockchip: enable SCMI clk for RK3528 SoC Message-ID: References: <20250306131016.281290-1-amadeus@jmu.edu.cn> <20250306131016.281290-2-amadeus@jmu.edu.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250306131016.281290-2-amadeus@jmu.edu.cn> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250306_065456_945058_5FDD6356 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.41 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 09:10:16PM +0800, Chukun Pan wrote: > Same as RK3568, RK3528 uses SCMI clk instead of ARMCLK. > Add SCMI clk for CPU, GPU and RNG will also use it. > It is highly recommended not to use clock protocol for CPUs and GPUs especially if the plan is to drive regulators separately. Please use the performance protocol instead which can abstract the clock and the regulator details for the OS. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip