linux-rockchip.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Corentin LABBE <clabbe@baylibre.com>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Cc: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	"Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	davem@davemloft.net, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, mturquette@baylibre.com,
	p.zabel@pengutronix.de, robh+dt@kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org,
	ricardo@pardini.net, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] reset: rockchip: secure reset must be used by SCMI
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 13:42:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZVtUOwFbz9NzX1Ly@Red> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231112202639.obvmnjlt4mpa52qr@mercury.elektranox.org>

Le Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 09:26:39PM +0100, Sebastian Reichel a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 10:28:59PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 11/11/2023 21:51, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 06:45:03PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > >> On 07/11/2023 18:35, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > >>> Am Dienstag, 7. November 2023, 17:21:41 CET schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> > >>>> On 07/11/2023 16:55, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> > >>>>> While working on the rk3588 crypto driver, I loose lot of time
> > >>>>> understanding why resetting the IP failed.
> > >>>>> This is due to RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET being in the secure world,
> > >>>>> so impossible to operate on it from the kernel.
> > >>>>> All resets in this block must be handled via SCMI call.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
> > >>>>> ---
> > >>>>>  drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c             | 42 ------------
> > >>>>>  .../dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h   | 68 +++++++++----------
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl and fix reported warnings. Some
> > >>>> warnings can be ignored, but the code here looks like it needs a fix.
> > >>>> Feel free to get in touch if the warning is not clear.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c
> > >>>>> index e855bb8d5413..6556d9d3c7ab 100644
> > >>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c
> > >>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/rst-rk3588.c
> > >>>>> @@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
> > >>>>>  /* 0xFD7C8000 + 0x0A00 */
> > >>>>>  #define RK3588_PHPTOPCRU_RESET_OFFSET(id, reg, bit) [id] = (0x8000*4 + reg * 16 + bit)
> > >>>>>  
> > >>>>> -/* 0xFD7D0000 + 0x0A00 */
> > >>>>> -#define RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(id, reg, bit) [id] = (0x10000*4 + reg * 16 + bit)
> > >>>>> -
> > >>>>>  /* 0xFD7F0000 + 0x0A00 */
> > >>>>>  #define RK3588_PMU1CRU_RESET_OFFSET(id, reg, bit) [id] = (0x30000*4 + reg * 16 + bit)
> > >>>>>  
> > >>>>> @@ -806,45 +803,6 @@ static const int rk3588_register_offset[] = {
> > >>>>>  	RK3588_PMU1CRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_P_PMU0IOC, 5, 4),
> > >>>>>  	RK3588_PMU1CRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_P_GPIO0, 5, 5),
> > >>>>>  	RK3588_PMU1CRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_GPIO0, 5, 6),
> > >>>>> -
> > >>>>> -	/* SECURECRU_SOFTRST_CON00 */
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_A_SECURE_NS_BIU, 0, 10),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_H_SECURE_NS_BIU, 0, 11),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_A_SECURE_S_BIU, 0, 12),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_H_SECURE_S_BIU, 0, 13),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_P_SECURE_S_BIU, 0, 14),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_CRYPTO_CORE, 0, 15),
> > >>>>> -
> > >>>>> -	/* SECURECRU_SOFTRST_CON01 */
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_CRYPTO_PKA, 1, 0),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_CRYPTO_RNG, 1, 1),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_A_CRYPTO, 1, 2),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_H_CRYPTO, 1, 3),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_KEYLADDER_CORE, 1, 9),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_KEYLADDER_RNG, 1, 10),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_A_KEYLADDER, 1, 11),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_H_KEYLADDER, 1, 12),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_P_OTPC_S, 1, 13),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_OTPC_S, 1, 14),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_WDT_S, 1, 15),
> > >>>>> -
> > >>>>> -	/* SECURECRU_SOFTRST_CON02 */
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_T_WDT_S, 2, 0),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_H_BOOTROM, 2, 1),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_A_DCF, 2, 2),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_P_DCF, 2, 3),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_H_BOOTROM_NS, 2, 5),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_P_KEYLADDER, 2, 14),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_H_TRNG_S, 2, 15),
> > >>>>> -
> > >>>>> -	/* SECURECRU_SOFTRST_CON03 */
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_H_TRNG_NS, 3, 0),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_D_SDMMC_BUFFER, 3, 1),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_H_SDMMC, 3, 2),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_H_SDMMC_BUFFER, 3, 3),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_SDMMC, 3, 4),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_P_TRNG_CHK, 3, 5),
> > >>>>> -	RK3588_SECURECRU_RESET_OFFSET(SRST_TRNG_S, 3, 6),
> > >>>>>  };
> > >>>>>  
> > >>>>>  void rk3588_rst_init(struct device_node *np, void __iomem *reg_base)
> > >>>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h b/include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h
> > >>>>> index d4264db2a07f..c0d08ae78cd5 100644
> > >>>>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h
> > >>>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h
> > >>>>> @@ -716,39 +716,39 @@
> > >>>>>  #define SRST_P_GPIO0			627
> > >>>>>  #define SRST_GPIO0			628
> > >>>>>  
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_A_SECURE_NS_BIU		629
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_H_SECURE_NS_BIU		630
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_A_SECURE_S_BIU		631
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_H_SECURE_S_BIU		632
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_P_SECURE_S_BIU		633
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_CRYPTO_CORE		634
> > >>>>> -
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_CRYPTO_PKA			635
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_CRYPTO_RNG			636
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_A_CRYPTO			637
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_H_CRYPTO			638
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_KEYLADDER_CORE		639
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_KEYLADDER_RNG		640
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_A_KEYLADDER		641
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_H_KEYLADDER		642
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_P_OTPC_S			643
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_OTPC_S			644
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_WDT_S			645
> > >>>>> -
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_T_WDT_S			646
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_H_BOOTROM			647
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_A_DCF			648
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_P_DCF			649
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_H_BOOTROM_NS		650
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_P_KEYLADDER		651
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_H_TRNG_S			652
> > >>>>> -
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_H_TRNG_NS			653
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_D_SDMMC_BUFFER		654
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_H_SDMMC			655
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_H_SDMMC_BUFFER		656
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_SDMMC			657
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_P_TRNG_CHK			658
> > >>>>> -#define SRST_TRNG_S			659
> > >>>>> +#define SRST_A_SECURE_NS_BIU		10
> > >>>>
> > >>>> NAK. You just broke all users.
> > >>>
> > >>> If I'm reading the commit message correctly, all resets in that area
> > >>> couldn't have any users to begin with, as the registers controlling them
> > >>> are in the secure space, and need a higher exception level
> > >>>
> > >>> So if  anything is trying to handle these resets, would end up with some
> > >>> security exception right now.
> > >>>
> > >>> Though I guess we might want to use different names and not reuse the
> > >>> existing ones. scmi clocks use a SCMI_CLK_* id scheme, so maybe SCMI_SRST_* ?
> > >>
> > >> I don't quite get what the patch wants to achieve. Why dropping driver
> > >> support for given reset ID is connected with changing the value of
> > >> binding for given reset?
> > >>
> > >> What is the point of this define SRST_A_SECURE_NS_BIU 10?
> > > 
> > > This is about two different reset controllers. The IDs defined here
> > > are used by the operating system to access the correct registers.
> > > The kernel has a LUT from the ID to a register addresses, which is
> > > something you asked for during upstreaming.
> > > 
> > > The ID defined by Corentin is for reset control via SCMI firmware,
> > > which has different number scheme than Linux. To me the suggestion
> > > from Heiko looks sensible (i.e. create a new ID scheme and keep the
> > > current one unchanged).
> > 
> > So the binding is not for Linux but for FW? This should be explained in
> > the commit msg.
> 
> No.
> 
> The current binding describes reset IDs, which are mapped by the
> Linux driver to register offsets in the CRU (clock-reset-unit).
> But accessing the crypto reset line directly from Linux (which
> usually does not run in secure state) will fail. Accessing it
> from correct security context with the current binding is fine
> though. Considering we are sharing the bindings with e.g.
> U-Boot, I suggest to keep the currently defined IDs.
> 
> But Corentin tries to get this running on Linux. For that he
> needs to ask the (SCMI) firmware running in secure state to
> please take care of the reset. The firmware is using different
> reset IDs (apparently the ones used by downstream Linux, which
> are derived from register offset).
> 
> In DT the difference looks like this (check the different phandles):
> 
> #define SRST_A_SECURE_NS_BIU 629
> crypto-old {
>     // existing binding from Linux perspective
>     // reset via direct CRU access
>     // NOTE: permission denied
>     resets = <&cru SRST_A_SECURE_NS_BIU>; 
> };
> 
> #define SCMI_RST_A_SECURE_NS_BIU 10
> crypto-new {
>     // new binding from Linux perspective
>     // reset via SCMI firmware request
>     resets = <&scmi SCMI_RST_A_SECURE_NS_BIU>;
> };
> 
> Instead of introducing SCMI_RST_A_SECURE_NS_BIU, Corentin
> currently just redefines SRST_A_SECURE_NS_BIU. This is quite
> misleading. If somebody does '<&cru SRST_A_SECURE_NS_BIU>'
> with the '10' value for SCMI, it instead resets
> SRST_A_TOP_M300_BIU.
> 
> So my suggestion is to go with the suggestion from Heiko and
> introduce SCMI_RST_A_SECURE_NS_BIU (or something similar).
> That also matches how the SCMI clks on RK3588 and some other
> platforms. See e.g.:
> 
> of include/dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h.
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> -- Sebastian

Thanks for yours suggestions, I will do it that way.

Regards

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-20 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-07 15:55 [PATCH 0/6] crypto: rockchip: add support for rk3588/rk3568 Corentin Labbe
2023-11-07 15:55 ` [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: crypto: add support for rockchip,crypto-rk3588 Corentin Labbe
2023-11-07 16:40   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-20 12:37     ` Corentin LABBE
2023-11-21  9:04       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-07 15:55 ` [PATCH 2/6] MAINTAINERS: add new dt-binding doc to the right entry Corentin Labbe
2023-11-07 16:20   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-20 12:37     ` Corentin LABBE
2023-11-07 15:55 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM64: dts: rk3588: add crypto node Corentin Labbe
2023-11-07 15:59   ` Heiko Stübner
2023-11-20 12:38     ` Corentin LABBE
2023-11-07 16:20   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-20 12:38     ` Corentin LABBE
2023-11-07 15:55 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM64: dts: rk356x: " Corentin Labbe
2023-11-07 16:00   ` Heiko Stübner
2023-11-07 16:21   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-07 15:55 ` [PATCH 5/6] reset: rockchip: secure reset must be used by SCMI Corentin Labbe
2023-11-07 16:21   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-07 17:35     ` Heiko Stübner
2023-11-07 17:45       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-11 20:51         ` Sebastian Reichel
2023-11-11 21:28           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-12 20:26             ` Sebastian Reichel
2023-11-20 12:42               ` Corentin LABBE [this message]
2023-11-07 15:55 ` [PATCH 6/6] crypto: rockchip: add rk3588 driver Corentin Labbe
2023-11-07 16:35   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-07 16:42     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-07 16:56       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-11-12 14:04   ` Aw: " Frank Wunderlich
2023-11-20 12:48     ` Corentin LABBE
2023-11-24 15:05       ` Aw: " Frank Wunderlich
2023-11-27 11:47         ` Corentin LABBE

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZVtUOwFbz9NzX1Ly@Red \
    --to=clabbe@baylibre.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=ricardo@pardini.net \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).