Linux-Rockchip Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de>,
	FUKAUMI Naoki <naoki@radxa.com>,
	Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
	Diederik de Haas <diederik@cknow-tech.com>,
	Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>, Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/ASPM: Enable only L0s and L1 for devicetree platforms
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:00:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aP9C0H_2XVk6MiLV@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251024203924.GA1361677@bhelgaas>

On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 03:39:24PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 05:20:33PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 05:12:38PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:

> > > Note that this will regress ASPM on Qualcomm platforms further by
> > > disabling L1SS for devices that do not use pwrctrl (e.g. NVMe). ASPM
> > > with pwrctrl is already broken since 6.15. [1]
> > 
> > Actually, the 6.15 regression was fixed in 6.18-rc1 by the offending
> > commit, but pwrctrl devices will now also regress again.
> > 
> > > Reverting also a729c1664619 ("PCI: qcom: Remove custom ASPM enablement
> > > code") should avoid the new regression until a proper fix for the 6.15
> > > regression is in place.
> 
> Help me think through this.  I just sent a pull request [2] that
> includes df5192d9bb0e ("PCI/ASPM: Enable only L0s and L1 for
> devicetree platforms").  If all goes well, v6.18-rc3 will enable L0s
> and L1 (but not L1SS) on Qualcomm platforms.
> 
> IIUC, if we then revert a729c1664619 ("PCI: qcom: Remove custom ASPM
> enablement code"), it will enable L1SS again, but since this is done
> in a dw_pcie_host_ops .post_init() hook, L1SS will only be enabled for
> devices powered on at qcom-pcie probe time.  It will *not* be enabled
> for pwrctrl devices because .post_init() was run when those devices
> were powered off.

Correct.

> I think this is the same as in v6.17.  v6.18-rc1 enabled L1SS for
> everything, including pwrctrl devices, because it was done in the PCI
> enumeration path, not the host controller probe path.  I think that
> enumeration is the right place to do this, but we need to figure out
> how to do it in a generic way.  At a minimum, we need to know that
> CLKREQ# is supported, and some platforms like dw-rockchip also need
> device-specific configuration [3].
> 
> Bottom line, I think we need to revert a729c1664619 for v6.18 to get
> all ASPM states including L1SS enabled on Qualcomm platforms for
> non-pwrctrl devices.  I'll post a patch for this.

Right, that would at least restore the 6.17 state of things with respect
to Qualcomm machines.
 
> Then try to figure out how to make this work for pwrctrl devices for
> v6.19.  Does this sound right?

Yes, unless you can come up with a simple way to enable L1SS during
enumeration on Qualcomm platforms, for example, using a driver callback
that returns true for platforms using the 1.9.0 ops to indicate that
L1SS is supported. That should address also the 6.15 pwrctrl regression.

Johan

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-27 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-23 18:06 [PATCH] PCI/ASPM: Enable only L0s and L1 for devicetree platforms Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-23 18:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-23 19:59   ` Diederik de Haas
2025-10-23 20:39     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-24  4:28   ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-23 18:27 ` Dragan Simic
2025-10-23 20:37   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-24 15:12 ` Johan Hovold
2025-10-24 15:20   ` Johan Hovold
2025-10-24 20:39     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-27 10:00       ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2025-10-27 17:12       ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-28 23:33         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-29  5:47           ` Christian Zigotzky
2025-10-29 15:59             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-29 17:25             ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aP9C0H_2XVk6MiLV@hovoldconsulting.com \
    --to=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=chzigotzky@xenosoft.de \
    --cc=diederik@cknow-tech.com \
    --cc=dsimic@manjaro.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=naoki@radxa.com \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox