From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93941EE01FF for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 14:22:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Ir+auscjx7wGYqlkN27gheIApBwG9LZuVsWFYVblpxA=; b=tau9Jk8IASwGo6 kiRhHFkX8ELNlhvt5qVl/5s6kqMKYRg1p1W9S7JRV2WCppR27TKHYEkz8F+EWzmEYyhuVODPG8y94 3KY18MhUQuHxhYtoKK8Ds2TlpQa+CZz2AL017b0zMAZl18VDbQGdbfgEpx9c6IN9daAp4bDMTduKt Oce9haacmi1XVOhLE9Wo8AnWo82m7cFJafrwOU4Vflk0BvirdGd2i7t/TEZ04L1WYw8CoVDhLPi5q 4x75GE0/v9/VouEym93u3RBuuPVL7m9AaByY8lS1izDpKRlDrw9jZfdREBiUVi8uvP92UD6r2A+1N WqTzfq6kHMdrnFeOy11w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vaacZ-00000004vqQ-2ASi; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 14:22:47 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vaacX-00000004vpz-1PdB; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 14:22:45 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6066000A; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 14:22:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4B1AC4CEFB; Tue, 30 Dec 2025 14:22:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1767104564; bh=aDLjB01UK3jf7Dq8YDojKtYOpc32gM+BspVDOEkyfFc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=eHrY1i2KVVVwolDMtjU8QxJXXRcPMFsEsjLrzfH5PpSSJdKoey6Pl7NHAYgnZg0he v2QjvTLKdiqY1rO2BMhRl80FNLNwdLDPkCvs+7coSSC86jcbDv0QXUCEm/paKc/sdN 3BsLGwVimdUKUnl0utu5kxHwp/EP0Mc3A6b8K4G1VNblsW8WEHmZUdFzwiZzWUWiuR qa6G05nmL710k0W6Szg4gvQzyvRAk+l8dZhLp2WVczc+22aNadPoOxCNLIBJTdpkbs b1JU79mz96+JD+buCqYxsS1n4+U4B+8PQVNdvxT6rMIC3rOxDw7zmfk/BEPcb3QHAt MIVmN2kW848JA== Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 15:22:39 +0100 From: Niklas Cassel To: Qiang Yu Cc: Jingoo Han , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Rob Herring , Bjorn Helgaas , Heiko Stuebner , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Remove duplicate dw_pcie_ep_hide_ext_capability() function Message-ID: References: <20251224-remove_dw_pcie_ep_hide_ext_capability-v1-1-4302c9cdc316@oss.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251224-remove_dw_pcie_ep_hide_ext_capability-v1-1-4302c9cdc316@oss.qualcomm.com> X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hello Qiang Yu, On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 02:10:46AM -0800, Qiang Yu wrote: > Remove dw_pcie_ep_hide_ext_capability() and replace its usage with > dw_pcie_remove_ext_capability(). Both functions serve the same purpose > of hiding PCIe extended capabilities, but dw_pcie_remove_ext_capability() > provides a cleaner API that doesn't require the caller to specify the > previous capability ID. > > Compile-tested only. Runtime testing on RK3588 hardware would be > appreciated. This patch does not appy on top of pci/controller/dwc Anyway, I applied it manually, and tested, thus: Tested-by: Niklas Cassel _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip