From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02F01FD4F1B for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 18:41:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=UWLFF03XP1wOsJUWdUGy2fwCbw4MHw5/9MyDAuopn1g=; b=S06KzSX3Sszfa+ 6ruHLXtGzpH05gWNeDsKsjY9b0uOItchWj2P97NzROpOvYOddw9Tjmv4ssxNTT68nJYZRR5Dj1Y/N 0b22ntluWuLx/q8fFfvsBxIyESksDNQ4pr/dxbx6SJlFVQMcsUJtQkbTrB4O/TZMNCXReIfwqDcVj z58jhsERZmZDc/kupV2Gg9Ff9Km2Fayny9vSHzqtFr1CyA8djsE+F1eGLH1bzlVx/YS+5Tm1iZz+k 4CygB448A/c2od2+kwrqIFJ70JeA2RZq+02CXP1aBucyxzBbiKKXq4web8NzMA+MimbtB7igO4J4K bWBsWw4gmpjMsqQlilrA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1w020l-0000000A6FP-0ZpG; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 18:40:55 +0000 Received: from mail-pl1-x62e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1w020h-0000000A6BI-1umx for linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 18:40:54 +0000 Received: by mail-pl1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2ae82df847bso30023715ad.2 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 11:40:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1773168050; x=1773772850; darn=lists.infradead.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bjFZ9oZWWc3RZ4UdO5rq+AZbr7uPDX73K58gh1+yuH0=; b=gtLybQfMSjecfKBaGNqaukRn3K/7o8JorJppIKNpCc+QM/VJDFJvQwwbooZQ9FcmwP GCJvFN1msrobA2RnJ6du+aZ+7LE8i6/Pk9CnOufc1FiA/Ls9JTwqbiEwN0GiAlxEDCyW 7H7mM09xEr8SCiQcpLZ64RPaXO8aM0vVmSFf5Iw80b+sAnAm9XsVaGZVzWdCHJWBX+ib /6nxmSb16ClMReUtBFSqlLUtXsyUxp9FlN1rO2Ktv660+THVRNhWB7k87ee+i1sMFwOr JgIovHR0jlAXD5w0qlh76L4y4llZogMns7Q8v4LbegdO35xX29KypZYhSSLLNFLOppEI Cy2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1773168050; x=1773772850; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bjFZ9oZWWc3RZ4UdO5rq+AZbr7uPDX73K58gh1+yuH0=; b=bL96wpFw16r03mWVTr4VmdWg97/7gnflCIA2NSH2dikOgeti2s6IlSgoMd5/0b7rZo dk2EHOzHgD31TOJrRZlSShzn2F51sKgzsVx6PUnWhZLJoKOdzPWZ3o9eZ97eAPPEoj6h /1mCr0k9VSd7Sdx+5Oizn5cPhXRoHh3aeTDZirv8DxcpjwRaTNxS4z6xrIwfJkPsbxI4 IOuIBTya6iUuTf6y0SwS3b3PbjGbDSAA/PAp5rSsoOvleZ0qHLwHp9awvdqXHAA5occQ cvZ7D3P59dLbJpWDKPCxNmiCgedD/HUZhyx86gJNZwbZNvp0flgVDL+1nwWrxJEf14Uy oy+A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV3U1D9XU9N7MWLkQkmGgcNqRWTKYiPl96eYN8odkq4fBQu4bR5hVyamyrP2gakh54+wcGzih5KQNpp/PENeA==@lists.infradead.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyB4w0Fb3A7ZbYlhVAN4yiWyJ2VULM/FG0yLoRJMAyoqHwsYvt6 dSmZot/hKrbThXZ6tbu5B4hmAY21rryNzYRwbpv3PSUg62sZTBHkH1S5 X-Gm-Gg: ATEYQzz7YkBOVMOqZpygZENGFEEoG2oNcrqpVNKykaR9u1AJD4KIakrrXGtqmuKWzFA pKrb+6YISdFonklRZOe9YiZn6SH0k0FgNwv9fZLVxP757Elqfs7t9Ft+J/H+71SKT1dcz0AwrYD J8s1AjA84klnC3jTD1LaYZ+5i1fdESX9mG0jukorlyztwzsQL3Rli5+KQeS3PaSs8PiTncv49Lh PHStoXvMn5dYlzT0t2i8IkOw6UElAt6YHQlNDoS0w/o4KSgnr6szsF9weuyzwgqydwIYiAPozQD He0qD8/LMChzF2DWUV2J9IBN9Ky4/uquihaOnbpNPeg4FShfQXBXJ3C5gi8qvsYkvj66PAcV2fU +dzcqhCg2n0LtM9gltTIz22oAipOkpIl0feMYWm5FZhH++FHscLgXWBKhrF32D6k/sPz90up89Z krFcGIoaMlDexIbPm7USM6BcSvL73F2dIGanx8Y9cVJy5xcw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:28c8:b0:2ae:5671:7071 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2ae8252cf0fmr96662285ad.43.1773168050081; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 11:40:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2402:7500:a44:85b:2953:97d3:b283:95c3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-2ae83e58592sm220535625ad.14.2026.03.10.11.40.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 10 Mar 2026 11:40:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 02:40:36 +0800 From: Kuan-Wei Chiu To: Philipp Hahn Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, cocci@inria.fr, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, gfs2@lists.linux.dev, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ntfs3@lists.linux.dev, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, v9fs@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/61] treewide: Use IS_ERR_OR_NULL over manual NULL check - refactor Message-ID: References: <20260310-b4-is_err_or_null-v1-0-bd63b656022d@avm.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260310-b4-is_err_or_null-v1-0-bd63b656022d@avm.de> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260310_114051_531528_8351CF99 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.83 ) X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Philipp, On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 12:48:26PM +0100, Philipp Hahn wrote: > While doing some static code analysis I stumbled over a common pattern, > where IS_ERR() is combined with a NULL check. For that there is > IS_ERR_OR_NULL(). > > I've written a Coccinelle patch to find and patch those instances. > The patches follow grouped by subsystem. > > Patches 55-58 may be dropped as they have a (minor?) semantic change: > They use WARN_ON() or WARN_ON_ONCE(), but only in the IS_ERR() path, not > for the NULL check. Iff it is okay to print the warning also for NULL, > then the patches can be applied. > > While generating the patch set `checkpatch` complained about mixing > [un]likely() with IS_ERR_OR_NULL(), which already uses likely() > internally. I found and fixed several locations, where that combination > has been used. Thanks for the patchset. However, I think we need a explanation for why switching to IS_ERR_OR_NULL() is an improvement over the existing code. IMHO, the necessity of IS_ERR_OR_NULL() often highlights a confusing or flawed API design. It usually implies that the caller is unsure whether a failure results in an error pointer or a NULL pointer. Rather than doing a treewide conversion of this pattern, I believe it would be much more meaningful to review these instances case-by-case and fix the underlying APIs or caller logic instead. Additionally, a treewide refactoring like this has the practical drawback of creating unnecessary merge conflicts when backporting to stable trees. Regards, Kuan-Wei _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip