From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] timers: Fix usleep_range() in the context of wake_up_process() Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:47:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <1476998490-4481-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+glpar-linux-rockchip=m.gmane.org-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org To: Doug Anderson Cc: =?ISO-2022-JP?Q?=1B$B2+Es=1B=28J?= , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Heiko_St=FCbner?= , "broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , Brian Norris , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Andreas Mohr , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , Tony Xie , John Stultz , Daniel Kurtz , Guenter Roeck , Akihiro Tsukada List-Id: linux-rockchip.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Douglas Anderson wrote: > > > > Please wait for a full review and do not send out patches 5 seconds after > > the first mail hits your inbox. > > Since you had previously commented on patch 1 and had already > commented on patch 2, I presumed you were done reviewing, but I was > obviously in error. My apologies. No problem. As a general rule you should not send updates like a machine gun. That issue is years old, so there is no rush to fix it just because some random (probably out of tree) code trips over it. Thanks, tglx