From: Sidong Yang <sidong.yang@furiosa.ai>
To: Igor Paunovic <royalnet026@gmail.com>
Cc: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net>,
Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Jiaxing Hu <gahing@gahingwoo.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] accel/rocket: search every core slot when a core is removed
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2026 22:25:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <apwUewaRnoTNXHCt@rock-5b-plus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904125936.26234-1-royalnet026@gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 04, 2026 at 02:59:36PM +0200, Igor Paunovic wrote:
> rocket_remove() decrements rdev->num_cores for each core it removes,
> while find_core_for_dev() searches slots 0 to num_cores - 1. Unbinding
> the cores in the order they were bound therefore loses the last one: by
> the time it is removed the search range has already shrunk past its
> slot, so find_core_for_dev() returns -1 and rocket_remove() gives up
> without doing anything.
>
> num_cores never reaches zero, rocket_device_fini() never runs, and the
> file-scoped rdev keeps pointing at a device that is going away. Binding
> the cores again starts from that stale count, because rocket_probe()
> takes rdev->num_cores as the slot to fill. On an RK3588, which describes
> three cores, the second round lands on slots 1, 2 and 3 while rdev->cores
> was allocated with room for three:
>
> rocket fdab0000.npu: Rockchip NPU core 1 version: 1179210309
> rocket fdac0000.npu: Rockchip NPU core 2 version: 1179210309
> rocket fdad0000.npu: Rockchip NPU core 3 version: 1179210309
>
> The write to rdev->cores[3] is past the end of the array.
>
> Nothing in tree reads the core array often enough to notice, so the
> overrun is silent today. It turned up while testing a devfreq series on
> top of this, where a worker walks every core a few times a second, and
> UBSAN caught the first bool it read out of the overrun entry:
>
> UBSAN: invalid-load in drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_devfreq.c:47:10
> load of value 5 is not a valid value for type '_Bool'
> Workqueue: devfreq_wq devfreq_monitor
>
> Record how many slots were allocated and search all of them. Every core
> is then found on removal, num_cores reaches zero, the device is torn down
> and a later bind starts from a clean rdev.
>
> This does not make unbinding a single core out of several work. probe
> still takes num_cores as the slot to fill, so rebinding one core while
> its siblings stay bound would write over a slot that is already in use,
> and rocket_open() still reaches for cores[0] whether or not anything is
> there. Both of those want more thought than a fix should carry.
>
> Found by unbinding and rebinding all three cores on an Orange Pi 5 Plus.
> With this applied, 25 unbind/rebind rounds and 5 module unload/reload
> rounds run clean there: the cores land in slots 0, 1 and 2 every time,
> whichever order they are bound in, and the shared supply goes back to a
> single user after each round.
>
> Fixes: ed98261b4168 ("accel/rocket: Add a new driver for Rockchip's NPU")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Igor Paunovic <royalnet026@gmail.com>
> Assisted-by: LLM sparse checkpatch
> ---
> drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.c | 2 ++
> drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.h | 1 +
> drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.c b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.c
> index 46e6ee1e72c5f..efd004194c1af 100644
> --- a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ struct rocket_device *rocket_device_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> if (of_device_is_available(core_node))
> num_cores++;
>
> + rdev->max_cores = num_cores;
> +
> rdev->cores = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_cores, sizeof(*rdev->cores), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!rdev->cores)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> diff --git a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.h b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.h
> index ce662abc01d3d..c62d567010696 100644
> --- a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.h
> +++ b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_device.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ struct rocket_device {
>
> struct rocket_core *cores;
> unsigned int num_cores;
> + unsigned int max_cores;
Hi Igor,
I've tested this patch in Radxa Rock 5 B+ and it works. The test is that unbinding all
cores in sequence 0,1,2 and rebind all. It seems that there is other issue about num_core.
For example, sched_to_core() finds core for sched with num_core and it could make same
error like find_core_for_dev().
Tested-by: Sidong Yang <sidong.yang@furiosa.ai> # RK3588, 3 cores
Thanks,
Sidong
> };
>
> struct rocket_device *rocket_device_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> diff --git a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c
> index 8bbbce594883e..2bcfe4ab3c68f 100644
> --- a/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/accel/rocket/rocket_drv.c
> @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static int find_core_for_dev(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct rocket_device *rdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> - for (unsigned int core = 0; core < rdev->num_cores; core++) {
> + for (unsigned int core = 0; core < rdev->max_cores; core++) {
> if (dev == rdev->cores[core].dev)
> return core;
> }
> --
> 2.43.0
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-05 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-04 12:59 [PATCH] accel/rocket: search every core slot when a core is removed Igor Paunovic
2026-09-04 13:59 ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-05 9:01 ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-09-05 15:13 ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-05 13:25 ` Sidong Yang [this message]
2026-09-05 15:11 ` Igor Paunovic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=apwUewaRnoTNXHCt@rock-5b-plus \
--to=sidong.yang@furiosa.ai \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gahing@gahingwoo.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ogabbay@kernel.org \
--cc=royalnet026@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox