Re: [v2, 2/2] phy: rockchip-inno-usb2: add a new driver for Rockchip usb2phy

[Frank Wang <frank.wang@rock-chips.com>]

Hi Heiko & Guenter,

On 2016/6/4 5:24, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Freitag, 3. Juni 2016, 12:59:22 schrieb Guenter Roeck:
>> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 02:48:10PM +0800, Frank Wang wrote:
>>> The newer SoCs (rk3366, rk3399) take a different usb-phy IP block
>>> than rk3288 and before, and most of phy-related registers are also
>>> different from the past, so a new phy driver is required necessarily.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Frank Wang <frank.wang@rock-chips.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>>   - Changed vbus_host operation from gpio to regulator in *_probe.
>>>   - Improved the fault treatment relate to 480m clock register.
>>>   - Cleaned up some meaningless codes in *_clk480m_disable.
>>>   - made more clear the comment of *_sm_work.
>>>   
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> +static struct clk *
>>> +rockchip_usb2phy_clk480m_register(struct rockchip_usb2phy *rphy)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct device_node *node = rphy->dev->of_node;
>>> +	struct clk *clk;
>>> +	struct clk_init_data init;
>>> +	int ret;
>>> +
>>> +	init.name = "clk_usbphy_480m";
>>> +	init.ops = &rockchip_usb2phy_clkout_ops;
>>> +	init.flags = CLK_IS_ROOT;
>> One more comment:
>>
>> include/linux/clk-provider.h:#define CLK_IS_ROOT                BIT(4) /*
>> Deprecated: Don't use */
>>
>> ... and the definition has been removed in linux-next.
> also, the created clock should be a child of the phy-supply clock. Please take
> a look at the picophy-variant (phy-rockchip-usb) that already handles that
> parent assignment.
>

Okay, I will refer and correct them in the next patch (patch v3) .

BR.
Frank