Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: display: rockchip: Add schema for RK3588 HDMI TX Controller

[Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>]

On 8/19/24 7:53 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 01:29:30AM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>> Rockchip RK3588 SoC integrates the Synopsys DesignWare HDMI 2.1
>> Quad-Pixel (QP) TX controller IP.
>>
>> Since this is a new IP block, quite different from those used in the
>> previous generations of Rockchip SoCs, add a dedicated binding file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
>> ---
>>  .../display/rockchip/rockchip,dw-hdmi-qp.yaml      | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 170 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,dw-hdmi-qp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,dw-hdmi-qp.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..de470923d823
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip,dw-hdmi-qp.yaml
> 
> Filename matching the compatible please.

RK3588 happens to be the first Rockchip SoC using the QP TX controller, but
more are expected to come, e.g. RK3576.  Should we add 'rk3588-' to the
filename and let it being dropped when the 2nd SoC is added?

>> @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/rockchip/rockchip,dw-hdmi-qp.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: Rockchip DW HDMI QP TX Encoder
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> +  - Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
>> +
>> +description:
>> +  Rockchip RK3588 SoC integrates the Synopsys DesignWare HDMI QP TX controller
>> +  IP and a HDMI/eDP TX Combo PHY based on a Samsung IP block.
>> +
>> +allOf:
>> +  - $ref: /schemas/display/bridge/synopsys,dw-hdmi-qp.yaml#
>> +  - $ref: /schemas/sound/dai-common.yaml#
>> +
>> +properties:
>> +  compatible:
>> +    enum:
>> +      - rockchip,rk3588-dw-hdmi-qp
>> +
>> +  clocks:
>> +    minItems: 4
>> +    items:
>> +      - {}
>> +      - {}
>> +      - {}
>> +      - {}
> 
> Why have you chosen to do things like this?  I find it makes things less
> clear than reiterating the names of the required clocks.

I've just followed the approach used in rockchip,dw-hdmi.yaml.  Personally,
I preferred this for making a clear distinction between common and custom
items, in addition to reducing content dupplication. 

If readability is more important/desired, I will expand the items.  For
consistency, I assume clock-names, interrupts and interrupt-names below
should be treated similarly.

>> +      # The next clocks are optional, but shall be specified in this
>> +      # order when present.
>> +      - description: TMDS/FRL link clock
>> +      - description: Video datapath clock
> 
> I don't get what you mean by optional. You have one SoC, either they are
> or are not connected, unless there's multiple instances of this IP block
> on the SoC and some do and some do not have these clocks?
> Ditto for the interrupts.

They were handled as such in vendor tree, probably assuming other SoC
variants might not need them.  I agree it doesn't make sense to have them
optional at this point.  Will fix this in the next revision.

>> +
>> +  clock-names:
>> +    minItems: 4
>> +    items:
>> +      - {}
>> +      - {}
>> +      - {}
>> +      - {}
>> +      - enum: [hdp, hclk_vo1]
>> +      - const: hclk_vo1
>> +
>> +  interrupts:
>> +    items:
>> +      - {}
>> +      - {}
>> +      - {}
>> +      - {}
>> +      - description: HPD interrupt
>> +
>> +  interrupt-names:
>> +    items:
>> +      - {}
>> +      - {}
>> +      - {}
>> +      - {}
>> +      - const: hpd
>> +
>> +  phys:
>> +    maxItems: 1
>> +    description: The HDMI/eDP PHY.
>> +
>> +  phy-names:
>> +    const: hdmi
>> +
>> +  power-domains:
>> +    maxItems: 1
>> +
>> +  resets:
>> +    minItems: 2
>> +    maxItems: 2
>> +
>> +  reset-names:
>> +    items:
>> +      - const: ref
>> +      - const: hdp
>> +
>> +  "#sound-dai-cells":
>> +    const: 0
>> +
>> +  rockchip,grf:
>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
>> +    description:
>> +      Most HDMI QP related data is accessed through SYS GRF regs.
>> +
>> +  rockchip,vo1-grf:
>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
>> +    description:
>> +      Additional HDMI QP related data is accessed through VO1 GRF regs.
> 
> Why are these required? What prevents you looking up the syscons by
> compatible?

That is for getting the proper instance:

	vo0_grf: syscon@fd5a6000 {
		compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-vo-grf", "syscon";
		reg = <0x0 0xfd5a6000 0x0 0x2000>;
		clocks = <&cru PCLK_VO0GRF>;
	};

	vo1_grf: syscon@fd5a8000 {
		compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-vo-grf", "syscon";
		reg = <0x0 0xfd5a8000 0x0 0x100>;
		clocks = <&cru PCLK_VO1GRF>;
	};

Thanks for reviewing,
Cristian

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip