From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF944C28B28 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2025 10:15:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=8tBvsR1U16q5ZKf/RU+s9Q1lxYj6vXi8nBZzX8Smc4M=; b=xtz9M9HfO38Pp9 IQhampXJb4xiFoaeCEcP1pvyrYKLxvEUYAaQC1RopfcSi7EFwTQv1gSUCByfqQiWvt4unfm00lfhx 3rvOidiRh0WB6++oGrZ79J7waj10QD2Juh6xeODlc24amLZNYKeGFE973z9Qh6BiW3Qb3kXbeVsHR GoUXxg6dBJ4Nia2qfEZDExjALIgypn8BS6BJ84xs4oDn3oNOkJnZZ+ObB8cHiK1OlSJim5SfI36QL hp4VGBqYMXyvP5SdOxOxcnecwoh3oBhyKnvM5/7UCZGE5y70x42YRiwmL5pbyAsoPDUBUE2dkjO97 HZaWjJLUOTXwUUWBfpfg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1trDge-00000000L3G-2Wk4; Sun, 09 Mar 2025 10:15:12 +0000 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com ([148.251.105.195]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1trDcq-00000000KbU-3gqE; Sun, 09 Mar 2025 10:11:18 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1741515075; bh=sQra10c30MYmky155tTp0EkDPmDnARSe2sYZR6ySckU=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=RHKbmtlj+KMHs2L793B6DvggLvnoRIlmnAfp8wcnileSwLHbHLAI9+B/HeGN/0uLw 2M1R4e8y6tG9LwnZ1ya6kVOzmldLzlMZMnogOXmmW+ZJCSz+liqVd5JwYCUZ2eZGep ZnZ7h6PUuVENMBtL0BfC5kskKjRLi70qfJ9eIe1aSQbU0hCl8yDWI0nXIiTiSecc1B yl2z5bKSQDgwaleDLirXARJN9ljEsofhUdc8AnZPMuuG8LnMBBVAT4wfOSbcDxsDfx X9QlgTtZFZ8TI4ta0rhpna3gn7bFZlGGd48U0ZMO874Wt/MlibrKI3seqszUz9MM80 3hmDBhbizPr5Q== Received: from [192.168.1.90] (unknown [84.232.140.93]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: cristicc) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C052317E05C1; Sun, 9 Mar 2025 11:11:14 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 12:11:13 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/12] phy: rockchip: samsung-hdptx: Fix clock ratio setup To: Dmitry Baryshkov Cc: Vinod Koul , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Heiko Stuebner , Algea Cao , Sandor Yu , Maxime Ripard , kernel@collabora.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org References: <20250308-phy-sam-hdptx-bpc-v5-0-35087287f9d1@collabora.com> <20250308-phy-sam-hdptx-bpc-v5-3-35087287f9d1@collabora.com> From: Cristian Ciocaltea Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250309_031117_070527_B0A27440 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.06 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 3/9/25 11:17 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 at 14:21, Cristian Ciocaltea > wrote: >> >> The switch from 1/10 to 1/40 clock ratio must happen when exceeding the >> 340 MHz rate limit of HDMI 1.4, i.e. when entering the HDMI 2.0 domain, >> and not before. > > Am I correct that the only functional change is a switch from > greater-or-equal to simple greater? Yes. _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip