From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>
To: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Cc: heiko@sntech.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
alchark@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add OPP voltage ranges to RK3399 OP1 SoC dtsi
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 10:32:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6bb3387-4396-45d4-9cb4-594d58095510@cherry.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dbee35c002bda99e44f8533623d94f202a60da95.1730881777.git.dsimic@manjaro.org>
Hi Dragan,
On 11/6/24 9:33 AM, Dragan Simic wrote:
> Add support for voltage ranges to the CPU, GPU and DMC OPPs defined in the
> SoC dtsi for Rockchip OP1, as a variant of the Rockchip RK3399. This may be
> useful if there are any OP1-based boards whose associated voltage regulators
> are unable to deliver the exact voltages; otherwise, it causes no functional
> changes to the resulting OPP voltages at runtime.
>
> These changes cannot cause stability issues or any kind of damage, because
> it's perfectly safe to use the highest voltage from an OPP group for each OPP
> in the same group. The only possible negative effect of using higher voltages
> is wasted energy in form of some additionally generated heat.
>
> Reported-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>
Well, I merely highlighted that the voltage was different on OP1
compared to RK3399 for the 600MHz OPP :)
So... If there's ONE SoC I'm pretty sure is working as expected it's the
OP1 fitted on the Gru Chromebooks with the ChromiumOS kernel fork
(though yes, I believe all Gru CB are EoL since August 2023). In the 6.1
kernel fork, there's also no range:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/refs/heads/chromeos-6.1/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-op1-opp.dtsi
So not sure we need to handle theoretical cases here. Will let
maintainers decide on that one. FWIW, there are two other OP1 devices,
the RockPi4A+ and RockPi4B+ which do not change the OPP either.
Cheers,
Quentin
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-06 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-06 8:33 [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add OPP voltage ranges to RK3399 OP1 SoC dtsi Dragan Simic
2024-11-06 9:32 ` Quentin Schulz [this message]
2024-11-06 9:41 ` Heiko Stübner
2024-11-06 10:45 ` Dragan Simic
2024-11-06 11:24 ` Heiko Stübner
2024-11-06 11:37 ` Dragan Simic
2024-11-06 10:38 ` Dragan Simic
2024-11-09 18:27 ` Heiko Stuebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f6bb3387-4396-45d4-9cb4-594d58095510@cherry.de \
--to=quentin.schulz@cherry.de \
--cc=alchark@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dsimic@manjaro.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox