From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA32AC87FCC for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2025 21:47:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=PpNQ4TvzuntQD55BQq6ezc2Tgc29IBs8VmAgeWv53hk=; b=WRPk1U5QruPXFO HSTBHde4UXPvYe0pVeBkqi/9Rjtm8c9rnsPU+1z/vUCJtjCRYw3jRUbpKSiRnJcgJue1L1+CJ4nhX nhIM6Tk/9+HZnllqCGO3VyruqnIt2+bi5S0Hy7mpbS8uUXawPRfZJuBtQsUyDFfC4j6Xvb9RT3x3H STaEIfjENN0sWtt0kj3qVo+wWleq7JVkCBVh8Y/nxVmhCKA82UUpinOHAeXkxQZxggbNV99S9WWnP UQs6gYu4NNGvEqDF5A/Pilg0IRBTbP7csR2Jrt3Q7zmx+amgoYL5LqRl14Os50tJjMHxI9E9yr/la V+4kKuLkodyNGLNrxNvw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ugsAo-000000008c9-0bCh; Tue, 29 Jul 2025 21:47:50 +0000 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([156.67.10.101]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ugs8J-000000008UR-3PSP; Tue, 29 Jul 2025 21:45:17 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=Wf/0uZWB4TN7Fbn1MCE47FdY12dXgDlIhEUAvFCkfX8=; b=Yk5kOHIl0CLrboS9EJbYvPpeSc k6mNYiPGw10mcTYl2R0LlVmtxGn6x5Ib1V3bCdw6TsAlDfC4vlv30lP1XUPv5+IrbZSfm14BCVv0b TsgH1A5agj+hZV6Oymoe5FrNPRb1l0UkIbuoCJKR5oDNaOWZl0YLLio6sfkxKRAyJ1YY=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ugs82-003EPg-Ro; Tue, 29 Jul 2025 23:44:58 +0200 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 23:44:58 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Jonas Karlman Cc: Chukun Pan , "alsi@bang-olufsen.dk" , "conor+dt@kernel.org" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "edumazet@google.com" , "heiko@sntech.de" , "krzk+dt@kernel.org" , "kuba@kernel.org" , "linus.walleij@linaro.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "olteanv@gmail.com" , "pabeni@redhat.com" , "robh@kernel.org" , "ziyao@disroot.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add RTL8367RB-VB switch to Radxa E24C Message-ID: References: <5bdd0009-589f-49bc-914f-62e5dc4469e9@kwiboo.se> <20250729115009.2158019-1-amadeus@jmu.edu.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250729_144516_006022_E880051E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.58 ) X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org > > I did a test today and the same problem occurred when running the new > > kernel on my rk3568 + rtl8367s board. This problem does not exist on > > older kernels (6.1 and 6.6). Not sure where the problem is. > > I had only tested on a next-20250722 based kernel and on a vendor 6.1 > based kernel. And similar to your findings, on 6.1 based kernel there > was no issue only on the newer kernel. > > I will probably drop the use of "/delete-property/ snps,tso" and include > a note in commit message about the TSO and RX checksum issue for v2. You are submitting a patch for todays kernel, not a historic kernel. If todays kernel needs this property to work, please include it. You can always remove it when you have done a git bisect and find what changed, and submit a fix. Andrew _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip