From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 05/18] xdp: Use nested-BH locking for system_page_pool
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 15:32:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250502133231.lS281-FN@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878qng7i63.fsf@toke.dk>
On 2025-05-01 12:13:24 [+0200], Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > --- a/net/core/dev.c
> > +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> > @@ -462,7 +462,9 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(softnet_data);
> > * PP consumers must pay attention to run APIs in the appropriate context
> > * (e.g. NAPI context).
> > */
> > -DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct page_pool *, system_page_pool);
> > +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct page_pool_bh, system_page_pool) = {
> > + .bh_lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(bh_lock),
> > +};
>
> I'm a little fuzzy on how DEFINE_PER_CPU() works, but does this
> initialisation automatically do the right thing with the multiple
> per-CPU instances?
It sets the "first" per-CPU data which is then copied to all
"possible-CPUs" during early boot when the per-CPU data is made
available. You can initialize almost everything like that. Pointer based
structures (such as LIST_HEAD_INIT()) is something that obviously won't
work.
> > #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> > /*
> > --- a/net/core/xdp.c
> > +++ b/net/core/xdp.c
> > @@ -737,10 +737,10 @@ static noinline bool xdp_copy_frags_from_zc(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > */
> > struct sk_buff *xdp_build_skb_from_zc(struct xdp_buff *xdp)
> > {
> > - struct page_pool *pp = this_cpu_read(system_page_pool);
> > const struct xdp_rxq_info *rxq = xdp->rxq;
> > u32 len = xdp->data_end - xdp->data_meta;
> > u32 truesize = xdp->frame_sz;
> > + struct page_pool *pp;
> > struct sk_buff *skb;
> > int metalen;
> > void *data;
> > @@ -748,13 +748,18 @@ struct sk_buff *xdp_build_skb_from_zc(struct xdp_buff *xdp)
> > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PAGE_POOL))
> > return NULL;
> >
> > + local_lock_nested_bh(&system_page_pool.bh_lock);
> > + pp = this_cpu_read(system_page_pool.pool);
> > data = page_pool_dev_alloc_va(pp, &truesize);
> > - if (unlikely(!data))
> > + if (unlikely(!data)) {
> > + local_unlock_nested_bh(&system_page_pool.bh_lock);
> > return NULL;
> > + }
> >
> > skb = napi_build_skb(data, truesize);
> > if (unlikely(!skb)) {
> > page_pool_free_va(pp, data, true);
> > + local_unlock_nested_bh(&system_page_pool.bh_lock);
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -773,9 +778,11 @@ struct sk_buff *xdp_build_skb_from_zc(struct xdp_buff *xdp)
> >
> > if (unlikely(xdp_buff_has_frags(xdp)) &&
> > unlikely(!xdp_copy_frags_from_zc(skb, xdp, pp))) {
> > + local_unlock_nested_bh(&system_page_pool.bh_lock);
> > napi_consume_skb(skb, true);
> > return NULL;
> > }
> > + local_unlock_nested_bh(&system_page_pool.bh_lock);
>
> Hmm, instead of having four separate unlock calls in this function, how
> about initialising skb = NULL, and having the unlock call just above
> 'return skb' with an out: label?
>
> Then the three topmost 'return NULL' can just straight-forwardly be
> replaced with 'goto out', while the last one becomes 'skb = NULL; goto
> out;'. I think that would be more readable than this repetition.
Something like the following maybe? We would keep the lock during
napi_consume_skb() which should work.
diff --git a/net/core/xdp.c b/net/core/xdp.c
index b2a5c934fe7b7..1ff0bc328305d 100644
--- a/net/core/xdp.c
+++ b/net/core/xdp.c
@@ -740,8 +740,8 @@ struct sk_buff *xdp_build_skb_from_zc(struct xdp_buff *xdp)
const struct xdp_rxq_info *rxq = xdp->rxq;
u32 len = xdp->data_end - xdp->data_meta;
u32 truesize = xdp->frame_sz;
+ struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
struct page_pool *pp;
- struct sk_buff *skb;
int metalen;
void *data;
@@ -751,16 +751,13 @@ struct sk_buff *xdp_build_skb_from_zc(struct xdp_buff *xdp)
local_lock_nested_bh(&system_page_pool.bh_lock);
pp = this_cpu_read(system_page_pool.pool);
data = page_pool_dev_alloc_va(pp, &truesize);
- if (unlikely(!data)) {
- local_unlock_nested_bh(&system_page_pool.bh_lock);
- return NULL;
- }
+ if (unlikely(!data))
+ goto out;
skb = napi_build_skb(data, truesize);
if (unlikely(!skb)) {
page_pool_free_va(pp, data, true);
- local_unlock_nested_bh(&system_page_pool.bh_lock);
- return NULL;
+ goto out;
}
skb_mark_for_recycle(skb);
@@ -778,15 +775,16 @@ struct sk_buff *xdp_build_skb_from_zc(struct xdp_buff *xdp)
if (unlikely(xdp_buff_has_frags(xdp)) &&
unlikely(!xdp_copy_frags_from_zc(skb, xdp, pp))) {
- local_unlock_nested_bh(&system_page_pool.bh_lock);
napi_consume_skb(skb, true);
- return NULL;
+ skb = NULL;
}
+
+out:
local_unlock_nested_bh(&system_page_pool.bh_lock);
-
- xsk_buff_free(xdp);
-
- skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, rxq->dev);
+ if (skb) {
+ xsk_buff_free(xdp);
+ skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, rxq->dev);
+ }
return skb;
}
> -Toke
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-02 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-30 12:47 [PATCH net-next v3 00/18] net: Cover more per-CPU storage with local nested BH locking Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-30 12:47 ` [PATCH net-next v3 01/18] net: page_pool: Don't recycle into cache on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-19 8:18 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2025-04-30 12:47 ` [PATCH net-next v3 02/18] net: dst_cache: Use nested-BH locking for dst_cache::cache Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-30 12:47 ` [PATCH net-next v3 03/18] ipv4/route: Use this_cpu_inc() for stats on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-30 12:47 ` [PATCH net-next v3 04/18] ipv6: sr: Use nested-BH locking for hmac_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-30 12:47 ` [PATCH net-next v3 05/18] xdp: Use nested-BH locking for system_page_pool Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-30 14:20 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-05-01 10:13 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-05-02 13:32 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2025-05-02 14:33 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-05-02 15:07 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-02 15:59 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-05-05 8:57 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-05 9:13 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2025-04-30 12:47 ` [PATCH net-next v3 06/18] netfilter: nf_dup{4, 6}: Move duplication check to task_struct Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-30 12:47 ` [PATCH net-next v3 07/18] netfilter: nft_inner: Use nested-BH locking for nft_pcpu_tun_ctx Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-30 12:47 ` [PATCH net-next v3 08/18] netfilter: nf_dup_netdev: Move the recursion counter struct netdev_xmit Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-30 12:47 ` [PATCH net-next v3 09/18] xfrm: Use nested-BH locking for nat_keepalive_sk_ipv[46] Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-30 12:47 ` [PATCH net-next v3 10/18] openvswitch: Merge three per-CPU structures into one Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-30 12:47 ` [PATCH net-next v3 11/18] openvswitch: Use nested-BH locking for ovs_pcpu_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-30 12:47 ` [PATCH net-next v3 12/18] openvswitch: Move ovs_frag_data_storage into the struct ovs_pcpu_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-05 12:34 ` [ovs-dev] " Aaron Conole
2025-04-30 12:47 ` [PATCH net-next v3 13/18] net/sched: act_mirred: Move the recursion counter struct netdev_xmit Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-30 12:47 ` [PATCH net-next v3 14/18] net/sched: Use nested-BH locking for sch_frag_data_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-30 12:47 ` [PATCH net-next v3 15/18] mptcp: Use nested-BH locking for hmac_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-30 12:47 ` [PATCH net-next v3 16/18] rds: Disable only bottom halves in rds_page_remainder_alloc() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-30 12:47 ` [PATCH net-next v3 17/18] rds: Acquire per-CPU pointer within BH disabled section Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-30 12:47 ` [PATCH net-next v3 18/18] rds: Use nested-BH locking for rds_page_remainder Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-05 23:02 ` [PATCH net-next v3 00/18] net: Cover more per-CPU storage with local nested BH locking Jakub Kicinski
2025-05-09 11:58 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250502133231.lS281-FN@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).