From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BA402DA0EA; Mon, 5 May 2025 23:02:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746486177; cv=none; b=M+T+PaijYZ7VKOCXAZWeQiOp9O9apIXXC8ndrMNw0RhfJYe7lJ+fXVlzT6dcEh/wKQwBdXYAR0yLDYUtC7RwOhgSudHWkOCBm8LQkuUQTaUcd7QhgSpAVpjTfbApeQue54NH/P7HmWU/bnDrwm9MDWpX5AW+bba+W5NMPyY2kow= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746486177; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pEmDVUXvc0J46+4t6pQY34qv1kz8YJhrfowiq+L+feA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gIjnDopG3EB3FvNPh07p7ILpgM2cSJHYBy80fHFfTptBzMpgnRIrIDbmxOgvcNwnWFgu1XWgZWNxFn/eFNxvMDeub/AAmAg9ZG7nl3E2Y2jFIBWqy0ZhmnQvMi0WZ3cQ7o9eiC3+daObQgIMgVpRQgedRhWUF0maCwHGe+K1SXA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=UXAcwsgW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="UXAcwsgW" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 57D1CC4CEED; Mon, 5 May 2025 23:02:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1746486175; bh=pEmDVUXvc0J46+4t6pQY34qv1kz8YJhrfowiq+L+feA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UXAcwsgWa1shdmgMd4J6YmBSb37jGGNWNiDwN5W0hrXuQCM4ei3rTEvGxbYQmpuOB 0KBVWAzhLvuusSaEiWughaw8K96UmAZLjNC/a4kn4GhytEsFD5U20nuy1iqQxESjk8 Gi5DW2Rm7rhtS96ChJgaN45Ae0+18fi3KuwW5c0F/7RWAKoW4g2OuDJxWCnpIkBgbL upx9EJrnmRlVrUc7RtdRj5ffRPtgry4B/7W6R8zhPWnr91k206yMzaaXfd/pLmZ6K0 bjF1J84dHygQUCWIPwmL0vrVaHF+vhB+Eup9PwF2xmqGrhqs/whyzKEoGTBShkWw7m /eyDguntyItSA== Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 16:02:53 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/18] net: Cover more per-CPU storage with local nested BH locking. Message-ID: <20250505160253.3d50ebab@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20250430124758.1159480-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> References: <20250430124758.1159480-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:47:40 +0200 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > I was looking at the build-time defined per-CPU variables in net/ and > added the needed local-BH-locks in order to be able to remove the > current per-CPU lock in local_bh_disable() on PREMPT_RT. > > The work is not yet complete, I just wanted to post what I have so far > instead of sitting on it. Looks fine overall but we're anticipating a respin for patch 5? When you repost could you split out the netfilter patches so they can be applied by Pablo to the netfilter tree? And there really doesn't seem to be a strong reason to make this series longer than 15 patches, so please don't add more: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html