From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 978F7224893 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 10:58:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751021903; cv=none; b=ql1qu4aY9/SgXznX1YThNfiwSJi71zE1gfOuiZIXtoh6oDUgAgkpwUnNaTNxTSzVXxK7dSwYOFIIkTnSQuVv+YnK958vCfNZYYZD7Wm9LRetHe8LiohdO2aPmMzts33UDP0l9f+/gY5I7BGhOVPEzROPOQxe5s/MRcEdOk3N7RQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751021903; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nokczJdNjBeOe5ze5EQmRsffE/70hbbfIGaoQd/8LAs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=DSvQS/eCGoaNZ8j8EAyZcqrEx6QKA0YI6dblOqbG3S/WhoE901m9N5gy2+3EojCG6bkEeZmZqrkDkgxd3M7FHiIXVHYqHY1CzrZIoWvYph7t2T1U8uKyek42uOUviEoXNB16s9B7+YS/csVz4w7XT3vHH1Pqb/u7gjpwDBOrbmI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=imXipUDs; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=PYyWBG/0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="imXipUDs"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="PYyWBG/0" Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 12:58:18 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1751021899; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gMI2XEketbNhS5bh80KpnDXH13ZRLP9sA5GUJ0OzeUE=; b=imXipUDsNpAJlJe4Vw/pF7qOQ0XbPAKXOgFnS0NjdXxc3XgcDOVnQyOfFf+KErDu3D9lgu +QwUCzYk0nDeXvkvjvdDmGBXIfcrPEI0/btoupKGIX9XsMXvGMRTAI6dJu+dp0DhI3Llhi ea7xSywEw0ufqtILKEpDmDpdYxQVpQF4PMD/iscTyI6TsbZTblY2+5iOFRbyIM6tyLSb17 HOLYVFDomJay3+3Q2GsxYoNI+7YRWpPe79UVJWr82fCFfgLrWt0NpaamjaAJadcioEgYFv fj5o6vg/J92nq1Xc2PlUxRNew+ESXfDGlTbxPRwlcpQNJwwXxi9W5f5F9NBbFg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1751021899; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gMI2XEketbNhS5bh80KpnDXH13ZRLP9sA5GUJ0OzeUE=; b=PYyWBG/0qp6EM/mKDZi4/LEQ2ovDKiGYpKiNZEWLhKCTcAZdiXuiJwKVcH0+IfFl1b9pAm 3BvHOvd42SqoLGAw== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Florian Westphal Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, Jozsef Kadlecsik , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] netfilter: Exclude LEGACY TABLES on PREEMPT_RT. Message-ID: <20250627105818._VVB4weS@linutronix.de> References: <20250404152815.LilZda0r@linutronix.de> <20250613125052.SdD-4SPS@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On 2025-06-13 17:30:45 [+0200], Florian Westphal wrote: > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > I've been rebasing my trees on top of v6.16-rc1 and noticed that this > > patch remained (because it still applies). My other nf patches were > > dropped because they made it into v6.16-rc1. > > > > Did something happen to this one? > > It had to be dropped due to fallout in net and bpf CI > pipelines. Oh. > There are problems with kconfig settings. > > A small subset of this patch has been upstreamed > c38eb2973c18 ("netfilter: xtables: support arpt_mark and ipv6 optstrip for iptables-nft only builds"). > > My plan was to zap some of the backwards-compat kconfig > knobs that we have and update various selftest config files, > then rebase this and retry. Anything that I can help with? Sebastian