From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] softirq: Provide a handshake for canceling tasklets via polling on PREEMPT_RT
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 16:39:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250812143930.22RBn5BW@linutronix.de> (raw)
The tasklet_unlock_spin_wait() via tasklet_disable_in_atomic() is
provided for a few legacy tasklet users. The interface is used from
atomic context (which is either softirq or disabled preemption) on
non-PREEMPT_RT an relies on spinning until the tasklet callback
completes.
On PREEMPT_RT the context is never atomic but the busy polling logic
remains. It possible that the thread invoking tasklet_unlock_spin_wait()
has higher priority than the tasklet. If both run on the same CPU the
the tasklet makes no progress and the thread trying to cancel the
tasklet will live-lock the system.
To avoid the lockup tasklet_unlock_spin_wait() uses local_bh_disable()/
enable() which utilizes the local_lock_t for synchronisation. This lock
is a central per-CPU BKL and about to be removed.
Acquire a lock in tasklet_action_common() which is held while the
tasklet's callback is invoked. This lock will be acquired from
tasklet_unlock_spin_wait() via tasklet_callback_cancel_wait_running().
After the tasklet completed tasklet_callback_sync_wait_running() drops
the lock and acquires it again. In order to avoid unlocking the lock
even if there is no cancel request, there is a cb_waiters counter which
is incremented during a cancel request.
Blocking on the lock will PI-boost the tasklet if needed, ensuring
progress is made.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/softirq.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 513b1945987cc..57a84758b8459 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -805,6 +805,56 @@ static bool tasklet_clear_sched(struct tasklet_struct *t)
return false;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
+struct tasklet_sync_callback {
+ spinlock_t cb_lock;
+ atomic_t cb_waiters;
+};
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct tasklet_sync_callback, tasklet_sync_callback) = {
+ .cb_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(tasklet_sync_callback.cb_lock),
+ .cb_waiters = ATOMIC_INIT(0),
+};
+
+static void tasklet_lock_callback(void)
+{
+ spin_lock(this_cpu_ptr(&tasklet_sync_callback.cb_lock));
+}
+
+static void tasklet_unlock_callback(void)
+{
+ spin_unlock(this_cpu_ptr(&tasklet_sync_callback.cb_lock));
+}
+
+static void tasklet_callback_cancel_wait_running(void)
+{
+ struct tasklet_sync_callback *sync_cb = this_cpu_ptr(&tasklet_sync_callback);
+
+ atomic_inc(&sync_cb->cb_waiters);
+ spin_lock(&sync_cb->cb_lock);
+ atomic_dec(&sync_cb->cb_waiters);
+ spin_unlock(&sync_cb->cb_lock);
+}
+
+static void tasklet_callback_sync_wait_running(void)
+{
+ struct tasklet_sync_callback *sync_cb = this_cpu_ptr(&tasklet_sync_callback);
+
+ if (atomic_read(&sync_cb->cb_waiters)) {
+ spin_unlock(&sync_cb->cb_lock);
+ spin_lock(&sync_cb->cb_lock);
+ }
+}
+
+#else
+
+static void tasklet_lock_callback(void) { }
+static void tasklet_unlock_callback(void) { }
+static void tasklet_callback_cancel_wait_running(void) { }
+static void tasklet_callback_sync_wait_running(void) { }
+
+#endif
+
static void tasklet_action_common(struct tasklet_head *tl_head,
unsigned int softirq_nr)
{
@@ -816,6 +866,7 @@ static void tasklet_action_common(struct tasklet_head *tl_head,
tl_head->tail = &tl_head->head;
local_irq_enable();
+ tasklet_lock_callback();
while (list) {
struct tasklet_struct *t = list;
@@ -835,6 +886,7 @@ static void tasklet_action_common(struct tasklet_head *tl_head,
}
}
tasklet_unlock(t);
+ tasklet_callback_sync_wait_running();
continue;
}
tasklet_unlock(t);
@@ -847,6 +899,7 @@ static void tasklet_action_common(struct tasklet_head *tl_head,
__raise_softirq_irqoff(softirq_nr);
local_irq_enable();
}
+ tasklet_unlock_callback();
}
static __latent_entropy void tasklet_action(void)
@@ -897,12 +950,9 @@ void tasklet_unlock_spin_wait(struct tasklet_struct *t)
/*
* Prevent a live lock when current preempted soft
* interrupt processing or prevents ksoftirqd from
- * running. If the tasklet runs on a different CPU
- * then this has no effect other than doing the BH
- * disable/enable dance for nothing.
+ * running.
*/
- local_bh_disable();
- local_bh_enable();
+ tasklet_callback_cancel_wait_running();
} else {
cpu_relax();
}
--
2.50.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-08-12 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-12 14:39 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2025-08-12 14:53 ` [PATCH] softirq: Provide a handshake for canceling tasklets via polling on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-08-12 19:38 ` Tejun Heo
2025-08-13 6:33 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-08-13 18:05 ` Tejun Heo
2025-08-18 12:52 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-08-18 17:41 ` Tejun Heo
2025-08-19 15:01 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-08-20 10:36 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-08-20 10:55 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-08-20 19:44 ` Tejun Heo
2025-08-21 9:28 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-08-21 17:10 ` Tejun Heo
2025-08-22 9:48 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-08-22 18:07 ` Tejun Heo
2025-08-26 15:49 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-08-26 16:27 ` Tejun Heo
2025-08-28 16:04 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-08-29 19:34 ` Tejun Heo
2025-08-13 8:20 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250812143930.22RBn5BW@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).