From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Clark Williams" <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
"Chen Ridong" <chenridong@huawei.com>,
"Pingfan Liu" <piliu@redhat.com>,
"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [cgroup/for-6.19 PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Make callback_lock a raw_spinlock_t
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 09:51:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251112085124.O5dlZ8Og@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251112035759.1162541-1-longman@redhat.com>
On 2025-11-11 22:57:59 [-0500], Waiman Long wrote:
> The callback_lock is a spinlock_t which is acquired either to read
> a stable set of cpu or node masks or to modify those masks when
> cpuset_mutex is also acquired. Sometime it may need to go up the
> cgroup hierarchy while holding the lock to find the right set of masks
> to use. Assuming that the depth of the cgroup hierarch is finite and
> typically small, the lock hold time should be limited.
We can't assume that, can we?
> Some externally callable cpuset APIs like cpuset_cpus_allowed() and
cpuset_cpus_allowed() has three callers in kernel/sched/ and all use
GFP_KERNEL shortly before invoking the function in question.
> cpuset_mems_allowed() acquires callback_lock with irq disabled to ensure
This I did not find. But I would ask to rework it somehow that we don't
need to use raw_spinlock_t as a hammer that solves it all.
> stable cpuset data. These APIs currently have the restriction that they
> can't be called when a raw spinlock is being held. This is needed to
> work correctly in a PREEMPT_RT kernel. This requires additional code
> changes to work around this limitation. See [1] for a discussion of that.
>
> Make these external cpuset APIs more useful by changing callback_lock
> to a raw_spinlock_t to remove this limitation so that they can be called
> from within other raw spinlock critical sections if needed.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251110014706.8118-1-piliu@redhat.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-12 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-12 3:57 [cgroup/for-6.19 PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Make callback_lock a raw_spinlock_t Waiman Long
2025-11-12 8:51 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2025-11-12 18:21 ` Waiman Long
2025-11-13 7:53 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-11-13 16:25 ` Tejun Heo
2025-11-13 16:35 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251112085124.O5dlZ8Og@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=piliu@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).