From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 619093933FE for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 20:30:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768595407; cv=none; b=nondaGdlt0DPvYVkajZjG4g9nLRWq2cPub4gK9GtFrphxnfAkzKb5hpMa2cflziyROQLkAs4jSPIxUku/9HsggPFO5HfrkDAh6Ley9uGEMLHRz1RH2kBkDolOSEtzdbBnWinuKQInlO17P18QzOTkvxRsIh2e06+Y6LlL9/jd6U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768595407; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4HlzR5qP1qW3gy3QPSAvAFHolihouueHIz/u+nMvo1Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=e8yAQEyGX4+BSunU2Qg7SsaaKScQzG+0sWk8yWzbTyULzvU3mLn0Z76AQm3tgttAIpmgK0jD0pi7XWJ4wIbBKsClzhtXv9/5sKHHEXnL1uD7ORVHdvsgPjekVln2yVqD+XrRb6iuyMurR6fjn30iznjIiK9Eqei47jYxA7BKAXU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=lNB4oS6L; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=ZAJ/26hU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="lNB4oS6L"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="ZAJ/26hU" Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 21:30:02 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1768595404; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WecrocRMKZU/iNM4UOnRLQSWj3zv3D/TPEXXPniLmn8=; b=lNB4oS6L/T2CJs+x4Ue/QNzT2Im4c+SSYJ2l+IqAVGrg80PZ7qzZbGSBrs9X8hLyq5xj+6 yBUBK7oJYhkZPerxNaQdhfwkWn3O9pzafpV03w7QUvZrUt9MUMyV/lsZ2HwLNtaxY4/uNW C7vPHJ4bMsNKYxt9Ax0sc6/HeKcrDKfb9ZZByZ3H40gNsbNr8yNH7E4GqnWjdaQXSMwfKD UOI8yIprFCNnS9mzukOhVJs/ccTK6K6idWlockkHpwurtihcvWcdZwRovXnRa5IMjzSIJY 26WoMK6GUvruDcn2HCGSL59U00vegz8EnpsRfJXWGvYV4vDsebbm3EKP9V9MMg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1768595404; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WecrocRMKZU/iNM4UOnRLQSWj3zv3D/TPEXXPniLmn8=; b=ZAJ/26hUWZYJCgXrahM+b5b5tJPh4hmp+MPndaGil0ynh7KDmT0wDBoUQVRohVpEgokmbM WtSNY2361Mo4+HBw== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: "Russell King (Oracle)" Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, Arnd Bergmann , Linus Walleij , "Yadi.hu" , Bryan Brattlof Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: mm: fault: Enable interrupts before invoking __do_user_fault() Message-ID: <20260116203002.ocPCBG8L@linutronix.de> References: <20260116170041.1059997-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20260116170041.1059997-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20260116181201.v-z31XJY@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On 2026-01-16 20:09:43 [+0000], Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > > Oh, and, as I've said on netdev recently, I have lots of patches. I > > don't have time to push all patches all the time. Those that I think > > are the highest priority get the attention - so if something goes > > quiet, the patches don't get progressed (because something else has > > taken over.) > > > > I haven't published these yet to my external git tree because they're > > currently on top of my raw private "development" branch containing... > > > > $ git lg origin..rmk | wc -l > > 473 > > > > many of those behind those I mentioned above. At some point I need to > > move them to their own separate branch, or to the "misc" branch after > > sending them to the mailing list... but the latter means spending time > > writing a covering message summarising the changes, and the key thing > > is "time". > > > > I've wasted almost all of today running a bisect for a stmmac issue that > > takes out my _entire_ network at home. It's wasted because what I > > thought was a good commit turns out, on re-testing, to have been bad, > > and right now I have no idea what a good commit is, and whether that > > even exists before the platform support was merged. > > Sorry for a third reply... yesterday I started at about 10am, finished > at 2am last night chasing a different stmmac regression. > > Yea, if there was more time, then I could push all the patches I have, > but I don't, and the above patches were generated back when we were > discussing the issue last time. No worries. Is your tree rmk tree public so I could pull those and test? Do you want me to review any of those? Sebastian