From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Xavier Roumegue <xavier.roumegue@oss.nxp.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@ndufresne.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] media: dw100: Merge dw100_device_run and dw100_start
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 20:14:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260210181436.GE2502896@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260129-sklug-v6-16-topic-dw100-v3-1-dev-v3-4-2eb5685eaf09@ideasonboard.com>
On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 12:43:13PM +0100, Stefan Klug wrote:
> The dw100_start() function is only called from dw100_device_run(). As
> both functions are not too big, move the code directly into
> dw100_device_run() and drop dw100_start() to improve readability.
>
> This patch contains no functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Added this patch as proposed in the review of v1
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/nxp/dw100/dw100.c | 61 ++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/nxp/dw100/dw100.c b/drivers/media/platform/nxp/dw100/dw100.c
> index 46e3a7b74fb777aa479110a52229f36b8632db44..c7c4249f5769467fb2b1f3c87f5685c4463a0a9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/nxp/dw100/dw100.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/nxp/dw100/dw100.c
> @@ -1442,25 +1442,42 @@ static irqreturn_t dw100_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> -static void dw100_start(struct dw100_ctx *ctx, struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *in_vb,
> - struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *out_vb)
> +static void dw100_device_run(void *priv)
> {
> + struct dw100_ctx *ctx = priv;
> struct dw100_device *dw_dev = ctx->dw_dev;
> + struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *src_buf, *dst_buf;
>
> - out_vb->sequence =
> - dw100_get_q_data(ctx, V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE_MPLANE)->sequence++;
> - in_vb->sequence =
> + src_buf = v4l2_m2m_next_src_buf(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx);
> + dst_buf = v4l2_m2m_next_dst_buf(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx);
> +
> + v4l2_ctrl_request_setup(src_buf->vb2_buf.req_obj.req,
> + &ctx->hdl);
> +
> + if (src_buf->vb2_buf.req_obj.req)
> + dw100_update_mapping(ctx);
> + else if (ctx->user_map_is_dirty)
> + dev_warn_once(&dw_dev->pdev->dev,
> + "V4L2 requests are required to update the vertex map dynamically"
> + );
> +
> + v4l2_ctrl_request_complete(src_buf->vb2_buf.req_obj.req,
> + &ctx->hdl);
> +
> + src_buf->sequence =
> dw100_get_q_data(ctx, V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT_MPLANE)->sequence++;
> + dst_buf->sequence =
> + dw100_get_q_data(ctx, V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE_MPLANE)->sequence++;
>
> - dev_dbg(&ctx->dw_dev->pdev->dev,
> + dev_dbg(&dw_dev->pdev->dev,
> "Starting queues %p->%p, sequence %u->%u\n",
> v4l2_m2m_get_vq(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx,
> V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT_MPLANE),
> v4l2_m2m_get_vq(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx,
> V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE_MPLANE),
> - in_vb->sequence, out_vb->sequence);
> + src_buf->sequence, dst_buf->sequence);
>
> - v4l2_m2m_buf_copy_metadata(in_vb, out_vb);
> + v4l2_m2m_buf_copy_metadata(src_buf, dst_buf);
>
> /* Now, let's deal with hardware ... */
> dw100_hw_master_bus_disable(dw_dev);
> @@ -1469,10 +1486,10 @@ static void dw100_start(struct dw100_ctx *ctx, struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *in_vb,
> dw100_hw_set_src_crop(dw_dev, &ctx->q_data[DW100_QUEUE_SRC],
> &ctx->q_data[DW100_QUEUE_DST]);
> dw100_hw_set_source(dw_dev, &ctx->q_data[DW100_QUEUE_SRC],
> - &in_vb->vb2_buf);
> + &src_buf->vb2_buf);
> dw100_hw_set_destination(dw_dev, &ctx->q_data[DW100_QUEUE_DST],
> ctx->q_data[DW100_QUEUE_SRC].fmt,
> - &out_vb->vb2_buf);
> + &dst_buf->vb2_buf);
> dw100_hw_set_mapping(dw_dev, ctx->map_dma,
> ctx->map_width, ctx->map_height);
> dw100_hw_enable_irq(dw_dev);
> @@ -1482,30 +1499,6 @@ static void dw100_start(struct dw100_ctx *ctx, struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *in_vb,
> dw100_hw_master_bus_enable(dw_dev);
> }
>
> -static void dw100_device_run(void *priv)
> -{
> - struct dw100_ctx *ctx = priv;
> - struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *src_buf, *dst_buf;
> -
> - src_buf = v4l2_m2m_next_src_buf(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx);
> - dst_buf = v4l2_m2m_next_dst_buf(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx);
> -
> - v4l2_ctrl_request_setup(src_buf->vb2_buf.req_obj.req,
> - &ctx->hdl);
> -
> - if (src_buf->vb2_buf.req_obj.req)
> - dw100_update_mapping(ctx);
> - else if (ctx->user_map_is_dirty)
> - dev_warn_once(&ctx->dw_dev->pdev->dev,
> - "V4L2 requests are required to update the vertex map dynamically"
> - );
> -
> - v4l2_ctrl_request_complete(src_buf->vb2_buf.req_obj.req,
> - &ctx->hdl);
> -
> - dw100_start(ctx, src_buf, dst_buf);
> -}
> -
> static const struct v4l2_m2m_ops dw100_m2m_ops = {
> .device_run = dw100_device_run,
> };
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-10 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-29 11:43 [PATCH v3 0/4] media: dw100: Dynamic vertex map updates and fixes for PREEMPT_RT Stefan Klug
2026-01-29 11:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] media: dw100: Implement V4L2 requests support Stefan Klug
2026-02-10 17:50 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-02-25 7:23 ` Stefan Klug
2026-02-25 10:57 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-01-29 11:43 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] media: dw100: Implement dynamic vertex map update Stefan Klug
2026-02-10 18:07 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-01-29 11:43 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] media: dw100: Fix kernel oops with PREEMPT_RT enabled Stefan Klug
2026-02-06 7:55 ` Xavier Roumegue (OSS)
2026-02-10 18:13 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-01-29 11:43 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] media: dw100: Merge dw100_device_run and dw100_start Stefan Klug
2026-02-06 8:04 ` Xavier Roumegue (OSS)
2026-02-10 18:14 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260210181436.GE2502896@killaraus.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas@ndufresne.ca \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=xavier.roumegue@oss.nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox