From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FFEA3590A4 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2026 10:51:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772448694; cv=none; b=Vwz7mHWW84i4gxsgrjwvB3WwwSUE6JQnuSPWokip4urFShbaVebIod4aKQdML9F4UhdXrygt/bvt2n7kCLvLQKEdswm0XovhbMMDPMEqbvFFH2aJna74yCMU0vUz7/6ZcB0+AqPryfmJ1KNzQ2j7i3OxkW3zlXln9szAymPKOzE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772448694; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gungxojt1JLveY2mcJNznXl62fn97xjVqtkUoY1ICuo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dwn/Z5DlOTNbzXAb98MxfbzJZMdSkP3ENe1pqMYQnDQWswedOGTpxfLAeN+usTAoQeXD7nH3V98uHaavL7LZQvQ7vTaRxPHFJS00/4109wi0v33giiFaDVeVJMNahYG+h89yZnm4Frm2RQlSp+PToJkHqfJlBP9lAcYexj6IP3I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=Wc8u8Prl; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=Vx4CdNhr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="Wc8u8Prl"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="Vx4CdNhr" Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 11:51:30 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1772448691; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=L0KCOyoLsIgluS1BqRcipX43WxCPDJ9M5ANAEO2kJJQ=; b=Wc8u8Prl3V1HRW1Zg3I5vIkZuDQBxfUEbq1gx/0/4I+XZnctpr3wF79l36Gg3VnsHNdWM+ nxFEa7MjHVYkIvs60GtH06Gsjw0HtMvzm5eJGTe8JZy/j2B6ccTqO8kj2puYZKx7RMP4sM DzLc+11eZWb/PAfjawTcJTXa5gS0kiAGobNAPKoRAQTXDy1KUwfREdXlRcib0/K70IBabW CUgZgmgsXGctxjsnWISXVIazy7LzLRNhB1gr3GipWenfIddFyHsNCYOyS+Wh4VE9BmmAwk Xz8l6iCAKXerxFVMRPCCC620s/v702sEm3We/Yd/0G1fBvBDBzy9Tq3vz5Tpcg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1772448691; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=L0KCOyoLsIgluS1BqRcipX43WxCPDJ9M5ANAEO2kJJQ=; b=Vx4CdNhrM/2/EmSrNiFcTRzywLsJxOtg2qh/Zl7BlpSVXbrZR6mPP+hUCbwMEdCr7tdTRA W2XRoy9gJLB4G+Bw== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: "Russell King (Oracle)" Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Clark Williams , linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: move FSR fault status definitions before fsr_fs() Message-ID: <20260302105130.HTs-UDqx@linutronix.de> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On 2026-02-27 15:19:28 [+0000], Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > The FSR's fault status bits depend on whether LPAE is enabled. Rather > than always exposing both LPAE and non-LPAE to all code, move them > inside the ifdef blocks dependent on LPAE to restrict their visibility. > No code other than fsr_fs() makes use of these. > > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Sebastian