From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] irq_work: Fix use-after-free in irq_work_single on PREEMPT_RT
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2026 08:50:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260402065015.JKszGSXu@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260330073234.303732-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
On 2026-03-30 15:32:29 [+0800], Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> On PREEMPT_RT, non-HARD irq_work runs in per-CPU kthreads via
> run_irq_workd(), so irq_work_sync() uses rcuwait to wait for
> BUSY==0.
>
> After irq_work_single() clears BUSY via atomic_cmpxchg(), it still
> dereferences @work for irq_work_is_hard() and rcuwait_wake_up().
> An irq_work_sync() caller on another CPU that enters after BUSY is
> cleared can observe BUSY==0 immediately, return, and free the work
> before those accesses complete — causing a use-after-free.
>
> Fix this by wrapping run_irq_workd() in guard(rcu)() so that the
> entire irq_work_single() execution is within an RCU read-side
> critical section. Then add synchronize_rcu() in irq_work_sync()
> after rcuwait_wait_event() to ensure the caller waits for the RCU
> grace period before returning, preventing premature frees.
>
> Fixes: 810979682ccc ("irq_work: Allow irq_work_sync() to sleep if irq_work() no IRQ support.")
> Suggested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Sebastian
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-02 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-30 7:32 [PATCH v2] irq_work: Fix use-after-free in irq_work_single on PREEMPT_RT Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-02 6:50 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260402065015.JKszGSXu@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox