From: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6.1-rt 00/15] net: Backport backlog-NAPI threads to resolve PREEMPT_RT softirq warning in SMP flush
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2026 02:16:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c3a8c0f-3820-4531-b179-b2656a7d3c7e@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015133811.PtBdJYyx@linutronix.de>
On 10/15/26 21:38, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> - NET + proper list
>
> On 2026-10-15 08:34:28 [-0500], Clark Williams wrote:
>> I don't have a fundamental objection to the backport and agree we should
>> do v6.6-rt first, then move that back to v6.1-rt.
>
> Okay.
>
>> So it sounds like we need to pull in the RPS code first?
>
> Yes. Wen, do you mind preparing a series for v6.6-RT?
>
Hi Sebastian, Clark,
Thanks for the feedback.
Agreed, v6.6-rt should be fixed first to avoid reintroducing the issue
when users upgrade from v6.1-rt. Regarding the RPS prerequisites, I will
check which upstream changes are already present in v6.6-rt and identify
the remaining dependencies for the backlog-NAPI threads and defer_list
cleanup. I will prepare and test a series for v6.6-RT soon.
Thanks,
Wen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1791912669.git.wen.yang@linux.dev>
[not found] ` <20261014150853.f8I2fNx0@linutronix.de>
2026-10-14 15:11 ` [PATCH v6.1-rt 00/15] net: Backport backlog-NAPI threads to resolve PREEMPT_RT softirq warning in SMP flush Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
[not found] ` <atDWZDywit4ilzJ8@demetrius>
2026-10-15 13:38 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-16 18:16 ` Wen Yang [this message]
2026-10-16 19:00 ` Clark Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2c3a8c0f-3820-4531-b179-b2656a7d3c7e@linux.dev \
--to=wen.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox