From: "Zqiang" <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>
To: "Puranjay Mohan" <puranjay@kernel.org>,
"Lai Jiangshan" <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
"Josh Triplett" <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
"Onur Özkan" <work@onurozkan.dev>,
"Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@kernel.org>,
"Neeraj Upadhyay" <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
"Joel Fernandes" <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun@kernel.org>,
"Uladzislau Rezki" <urezki@gmail.com>,
"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>
Cc: "Puranjay Mohan" <puranjay@kernel.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
"Matt Fleming" <mfleming@cloudflare.com>,
"Harry Yoo (Oracle)" <harry@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] srcu: Make call_srcu() safe to call from any context
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 14:04:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5421cedd8d7372ed4b89836ac19a975226346364@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260805122346.269445-4-puranjay@kernel.org>
>
> call_srcu() has the same constraint as call_rcu(): its callback list and
> locks are only touched with interrupts disabled. srcu_gp_start_if_needed()
> enqueues under raw_spin_lock_irqsave() and may walk the srcu_node tree, as
> do callback invocation and grace-period work. A call_srcu() with
> interrupts disabled can race a list operation in flight on this CPU and
> corrupt the list or deadlock. call_rcu_tasks_trace() is call_srcu() under
> the hood, so a sleepable BPF program freeing an object can reach this.
>
> Defer as call_rcu() does: stage the callback on the srcu_data's
> ->defer_cbs, chain that srcu_data onto a per-CPU list, and raise a per-CPU
> irq_work that re-issues it straight to the enqueue helper, never back
> through __call_srcu(). The common path is unchanged and keeps interrupts
> enabled across srcu_gp_start_if_needed().
>
> The irq_work is per-CPU rather than per-srcu_struct and statically
> initialized, so deferral never runs check_init_srcu_struct(); it is
> IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD as for call_rcu(). srcu_barrier() and
> cleanup_srcu_struct() flush it first, and rcutree_migrate_callbacks()
> calls srcu_offline_drain() for an outgoing CPU. ->lock is held across the
> drain so the drainers serialize.
>
> As in call_rcu(), the re-issue runs with interrupts disabled and can be
> re-entered by instrumentation, so a flag on the srcu_data being drained
> drops a deferring call_srcu() seen mid-drain (unless from an NMI). Staging
> records only the callback, so an expedited request is remembered per
> srcu_data in ->defer_exp and the whole batch is re-issued expedited rather
> than silently downgraded to a normal grace period. A dropped callback can
> also strand state its caller associated with it, not just the callback
> itself.
>
> Gated by CONFIG_RCU_DEFER. Under CONFIG_PROVE_RCU, warn if the direct
> path is reached from an NMI.
>
> Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/linux/srcutree.h | 5 ++
> kernel/rcu/rcu.h | 3 +
> kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 171 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +
> 4 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/srcutree.h b/include/linux/srcutree.h
> index 75e54e4f963fa..09a9c8f4a6d24 100644
> --- a/include/linux/srcutree.h
> +++ b/include/linux/srcutree.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
>
> #include <linux/rcu_node_tree.h>
> #include <linux/completion.h>
> +#include <linux/irq_work_types.h>
> +#include <linux/llist.h>
>
> struct srcu_node;
> struct srcu_struct;
> @@ -41,6 +43,9 @@ struct srcu_data {
> bool srcu_cblist_invoking; /* Invoking these CBs? */
> struct timer_list delay_work; /* Delay for CB invoking */
> struct work_struct work; /* Context for CB invoking. */
> + struct llist_head defer_cbs; /* Callbacks deferred on re-entry. */
> + struct llist_node defer_link; /* Links onto the per-CPU deferral drain list */
> + bool defer_exp; /* A deferred callback asked to expedite. */
> struct rcu_head srcu_barrier_head; /* For srcu_barrier() use. */
> struct rcu_head srcu_ec_head; /* For srcu_expedite_current() use. */
> int srcu_ec_state; /* State for srcu_expedite_current(). */
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> index fd075d91b80cf..84d74cd5a351c 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> @@ -587,6 +587,9 @@ static inline bool should_rcu_defer(void)
> return irqs_disabled() && rcu_scheduler_active != RCU_SCHEDULER_INACTIVE;
> }
>
> +/* Drain an outgoing CPU's deferred SRCU callbacks; see rcutree_migrate_callbacks(). */
> +void srcu_offline_drain(int cpu);
> +
> enum rcutorture_type {
> RCU_FLAVOR,
> RCU_TASKS_FLAVOR,
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> index 304112674e8a2..35fface51d50b 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/percpu.h>
> #include <linux/preempt.h>
> #include <linux/irq_work.h>
> +#include <linux/llist.h>
> #include <linux/rcupdate_wait.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/smp.h>
> @@ -79,6 +80,45 @@ static void process_srcu(struct work_struct *work);
> static void srcu_irq_work(struct irq_work *work);
> static void srcu_delay_timer(struct timer_list *t);
>
> +struct srcu_defer;
> +static void srcu_defer_drain(struct irq_work *iw);
> +static void __srcu_defer_drain(struct srcu_defer *sndp, bool guard);
> +
> +/*
> + * Per-CPU call_srcu() deferral state, shared by every srcu_struct. A deferred
> + * callback is staged on its srcu_data's ->defer_cbs; that srcu_data is chained
> + * via ->defer_link onto ->list, which the irq_work walks.
> + */
> +struct srcu_defer {
> + struct llist_head list;
> + struct irq_work iw;
> + raw_spinlock_t lock;
> + bool draining;
> +};
> +
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct srcu_defer, srcu_defer) = {
> + .lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(srcu_defer.lock),
> + .iw = IRQ_WORK_INIT_HARD(srcu_defer_drain),
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Flush pending deferred callbacks so a following srcu_barrier() waits for them.
> + */
> +static void srcu_defer_flush(void)
> +{
> + int cpu;
> +
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_DEFER))
> + return;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + struct srcu_defer *sndp = &per_cpu(srcu_defer, cpu);
> +
> + if (!llist_empty(&sndp->list))
> + __srcu_defer_drain(sndp, false);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Initialize SRCU per-CPU data. Note that statically allocated
> * srcu_struct structures might already have srcu_read_lock() and
> @@ -107,6 +147,11 @@ static void init_srcu_struct_data(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
> sdp->cpu = cpu;
> INIT_WORK(&sdp->work, srcu_invoke_callbacks);
> timer_setup(&sdp->delay_work, srcu_delay_timer, 0);
> + /*
> + * ->defer_cbs, ->defer_link and ->defer_exp are valid when zeroed
> + * and are not reinitialized here, lest we clobber callbacks a
> + * reentrant call_srcu() already staged. See __call_srcu().
> + */
> sdp->ssp = ssp;
> }
> }
> @@ -695,7 +740,12 @@ void cleanup_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
> return; /* Just leak it! */
> if (WARN_ON(srcu_readers_active(ssp)))
> return; /* Just leak it! */
> - /* Wait for irq_work to finish first as it may queue a new work. */
> + /*
> + * Drain deferred callbacks before syncing ->irq_work: re-issuing one can
> + * start a grace period and re-queue ->irq_work, which then schedules
> + * ->work, so both must be waited out after the drain.
> + */
> + srcu_defer_flush();
> irq_work_sync(&sup->irq_work);
> flush_delayed_work(&sup->work);
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> @@ -1410,8 +1460,8 @@ static unsigned long srcu_gp_start_if_needed(struct srcu_struct *ssp,
> * srcu_read_lock(), and srcu_read_unlock() that are all passed the same
> * srcu_struct structure.
> */
> -static void __call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
> - rcu_callback_t func, bool do_norm)
> +static void srcu_do_enqueue(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
> + rcu_callback_t func, bool do_norm)
> {
> if (debug_rcu_head_queue(rhp)) {
> /* Probable double call_srcu(), so leak the callback. */
> @@ -1423,6 +1473,111 @@ static void __call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
> (void)srcu_gp_start_if_needed(ssp, rhp, do_norm);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * The srcu_cblist and srcu_node tree are only accessed with interrupts disabled
> + * (srcu_gp_start_if_needed() enqueues under raw_spin_lock_irqsave() and may walk
> + * the tree). Like call_rcu(), __call_srcu() defers when interrupts are already
> + * disabled, so a re-entrant call_srcu() -- e.g. call_rcu_tasks_trace() from a
> + * BPF program -- cannot corrupt the list or deadlock.
> + */
> +static void __call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
> + rcu_callback_t func, bool do_norm)
> +{
> + if (should_rcu_defer()) {
> + struct srcu_defer *sndp = this_cpu_ptr(&srcu_defer);
> + struct srcu_data *sdp;
> +
> + /*
> + * Instrumentation on the enqueue path can re-enter here from
> + * inside srcu_defer_drain(). Re-queuing would livelock the
> + * drain, so drop the callback; an NMI cannot loop, so let it in.
> + */
> + if (READ_ONCE(sndp->draining) && !in_nmi()) {
> + WARN_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU),
> + "call_srcu() re-entered during callback drain; leaking callback\n");
> + return;
> + }
> + sdp = this_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda);
> + rhp->func = func;
> + if (!do_norm)
> + WRITE_ONCE(sdp->defer_exp, true);
> + if (llist_add((struct llist_node *)rhp, &sdp->defer_cbs)) {
> + /*
> + * Chain this srcu_data for the drain. ->ssp must be
> + * published here: deferral skips check_init_srcu_struct(),
> + * so on a never-initialized static srcu_struct the
> + * statically zeroed ->sda still has a NULL ->ssp.
> + */
> + sdp->ssp = ssp;
> + if (llist_add(&sdp->defer_link, &sndp->list))
> + irq_work_queue(&sndp->iw);
> + }
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* An NMI reaching here entered with irqs enabled, so the enqueue can race. */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU) && in_nmi());
> +
> + srcu_do_enqueue(ssp, rhp, func, do_norm);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Re-issue deferred callbacks straight to srcu_do_enqueue() so they cannot defer
> + * again. ->lock serializes the drainers: the irq_work, srcu_defer_flush() and
> + * srcu_offline_drain().
> + */
> +static void __srcu_defer_drain(struct srcu_defer *sndp, bool guard)
> +{
> + struct llist_node *snode, *snext;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sndp->lock, flags);
> + if (guard)
> + WRITE_ONCE(sndp->draining, true);
> + llist_for_each_safe(snode, snext, llist_del_all(&sndp->list)) {
> + struct srcu_data *sdp = container_of(snode, struct srcu_data, defer_link);
> + struct srcu_struct *ssp = sdp->ssp;
> + struct llist_node *cnode, *cnext;
> + bool do_norm;
> +
> + cnode = llist_del_all(&sdp->defer_cbs);
> + do_norm = !READ_ONCE(sdp->defer_exp);
> + if (!do_norm)
> + WRITE_ONCE(sdp->defer_exp, false);
> + llist_for_each_safe(cnode, cnext, cnode) {
> + struct rcu_head *rhp = (struct rcu_head *)cnode;
> +
> + rhp->next = NULL;
> + srcu_do_enqueue(ssp, rhp, rhp->func, do_norm);
> + }
> + }
> + if (guard)
> + WRITE_ONCE(sndp->draining, false);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sndp->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Only the irq_work drain can be re-fed by its own re-issue, so only it sets
> + * ->draining. A direct drain re-issues onto this CPU, and anything staged
> + * during it is picked up by that CPU's own irq_work.
> + */
> +static void srcu_defer_drain(struct irq_work *iw)
> +{
> + __srcu_defer_drain(container_of(iw, struct srcu_defer, iw), true);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Drain @cpu's deferred call_srcu() callbacks from rcutree_migrate_callbacks()
> + * once @cpu is dead. One pass covers every srcu_struct, and the re-issue lands
> + * on the current CPU.
> + */
> +void srcu_offline_drain(int cpu)
> +{
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_DEFER))
> + return;
> + __srcu_defer_drain(&per_cpu(srcu_defer, cpu), false);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * call_srcu() - Queue a callback for invocation after an SRCU grace period
> * @ssp: srcu_struct in queue the callback
> @@ -1677,9 +1832,17 @@ void srcu_barrier(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
> {
> int cpu;
> int idx;
> - unsigned long s = rcu_seq_snap(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_seq);
> + unsigned long s;
>
> check_init_srcu_struct(ssp);
> +
> + /*
> + * Register any deferred callbacks before snapshotting the sequence. The
> + * shared irq_work may also drain other srcu_structs', which is harmless.
> + */
> + srcu_defer_flush();
If there are two ssp1 and ssp2 concurrent call srcu_barrier(),
and assuming there are only two CPUs, CPU0->sndp0 and CPU1->sndp1.
srcu_barrier(&ssp1)
->srcu_defer_flush()
->llist_empty(&sndp0->list) is not empty
->__srcu_defer_drain(sndp0)
->raw_spinlock()
->llist_for_each_safe(llist_del_all(&sndp0->list))
srcu_barrier(&ssp2)
->srcu_defer_flush()
->llist_empty(&sndp0->list) is empty
...
->srcu_barrier_one_cpu()
->sdp0 = per_cpu_ptr(ssp2->sda, 0)
->rcu_segcblist_entrain(&sdp0->srcu_cblist, ...)
//the sdp0->srcu_cblist is empty, return false.
return;
->srcu_do_enqueue(ssp2, rhp, rhp->func, do_norm);
// the srcu_barrier(&ssp2) has already return,
// miss waiting to current queue ssp2's callback
// to complete.
Thanks
Zqiang
> +
> + s = rcu_seq_snap(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_seq);
> mutex_lock(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_mutex);
> if (rcu_seq_done(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_seq, s)) {
> smp_mb(); /* Force ordering following return. */
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 6a83408974c2b..227790a87b02f 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -4646,6 +4646,8 @@ void rcutree_migrate_callbacks(int cpu)
> * returns; the re-issue lands on this CPU.
> */
> __rcu_defer_drain(rdp, false);
> + /* Likewise for the outgoing CPU's deferred call_srcu() callbacks. */
> + srcu_offline_drain(cpu);
>
> if (rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp))
> return;
> --
> 2.53.0-Meta
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 12:23 [PATCH v3 0/6] rcu,srcu: Make call_rcu()/call_srcu() safe from any context Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-05 12:23 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] rcu: Make call_rcu() safe to call " Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-05 12:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 16:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-08-05 12:23 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] rcu: Make Tiny " Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-05 12:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 12:23 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] srcu: Make call_srcu() " Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-05 12:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 14:04 ` Zqiang [this message]
2026-08-06 14:08 ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-05 12:23 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] srcu: Make Tiny " Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-05 12:23 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] rcutorture: Exercise ->call() from NMI context Puranjay Mohan
2026-08-05 12:23 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add a call_srcu() re-entry reproducer Puranjay Mohan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5421cedd8d7372ed4b89836ac19a975226346364@linux.dev \
--to=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mfleming@cloudflare.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox