From: Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Calvin Owens <calvin@wbinvd.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
spasswolf@web.de,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
dschatzberg@meta.com, peterz@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: ~90s shutdown delay with v6.19 and PREEMPT_RT
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 14:36:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80f657156fb2d32d8fe246e65e9ac8bf9d7cfbd5.camel@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260223032257.4e6db467@fedora>
Am Montag, dem 23.02.2026 um 03:22 -0500 schrieb Steven Rostedt:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2026 01:35:36 +0100
> Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de> wrote:
>
> > So the time to was is ~120s with PREEMPT_RT and 7s without.
> >
> > The interesting difference between these two traces is that the second one only
> > contains messages with "status" d..2. while the first also contains some with different status
> > (191 of 265126). Could these be the reason for the delay.
> >
> > $ grep -v d..2. trace.txt
> >
> > # tracer: nop
> > #
> > # entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 265126/265126 #P:16
> > #
> > # _-----=> irqs-off/BH-disabled
> > # / _----=> need-resched
> > # | / _---=> hardirq/softirq
> > # || / _--=> preempt-depth
> > # ||| / _-=> migrate-disable
> > # |||| / delay
> > # TASK-PID CPU# ||||| TIMESTAMP FUNCTION
> > # | | | ||||| | |
> > <...>-1584 [011] D..22 62.779670: sched_switch: prev_comm=ntpd prev_pid=0x630 (1584) prev_prio=0x78 (120) prev_state=0x100 (256)
> > next_comm=mt76-tx phy0 next_pid=0x5fb (1531) next_prio=0x62 (98)
>
> The 'D' means both interrupts 'd' and softirqs 'b' are disabled.
>
> The last number is migrate disable which means the task is pinned to a
> CPU. That may be an issue if the system is trying to take down a CPU
> and there's a task pinned to it.
>
> Now that we know that the persistent ring buffer works, we can add even
> more debugging. We could see where things are stuck...
>
> cd /sys/kernel/tracing/instances/boot_map
> echo 'stacktrace if prev_state & 3' > events/sched/sched_switch/trigger
>
> That will do a stacktrace at every location that schedules out in a
> non-running state. That way we can see what is waiting for something to
> finish.
I tried that twice and got these results:
Commands:
echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/instances/boot_map/events/sched/sched_switch/enable
echo 'stacktrace if prev_state & 3' > /sys/kernel/tracing/instances/boot_map/events/sched/sched_switch/trigger
echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/instances/boot_map/tracing_on
reboot
The first time (despite the 265000 entries) the reboot happened at
normals speed, even thought the timestamps suggest something different:
# entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 265170/265170 #P:16
[...]
<...>-158 [009] d..2. 98.680157: sched_switch: prev_comm=kworker/u64:13 prev_pid=0x9e (158) prev_prio=0x78 (120) prev_state=0x80 (128)
next_comm=swapper/9 next_pid=0x0 (0) next_prio=0x78 (120)
[...]
<...>-70 [012] d..2. 166.155040: sched_switch: prev_comm=ksoftirqd/12 prev_pid=0x46 (70) prev_prio=0x78 (120) prev_state=0x1 (1)
next_comm=swapper/12 next_pid=0x0 (0) next_prio=0x78 (120)
Here are the messages from /var/log/kern.log that show the last messages of the old kernel
and the first message of the new:
2026-02-23T13:57:38.441240+01:00 lisa kernel: [ T156] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: [drm] Cannot find any crtc or sizes
2026-02-23T13:58:04.876308+01:00 lisa kernel: [ T0] Linux version 6.19.0-trace (bert@lisa) (gcc (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian)
2.44) #1160 SMP PREEMPT_RT Sat Feb 21 00:22:46 CET 2026
So while the time stamps in the trace suggest that the reboot took at least 68 seconds,
/var/log/kern.log shows that it took only 26s at most. As I observed the whole thing I'm sure
kern.log is correct here.
Then I repeated the process above and this time the shutdown got stuck
again, but the trace was actually shorter:
# entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 195123/195123 #P:16
[...]
<idle>-0 [002] d..2. 135.554543: sched_switch: prev_comm=swapper/2 prev_pid=0x0 (0) prev_prio=0x78 (120) prev_state=0x0 (0) next_comm=xfce4-
terminal next_pid=0x7b7 (1975) next_prio=0x78 (120)
[...]
<idle>-0 [000] d..2. 242.301841: sched_switch: prev_comm=swapper/0 prev_pid=0x0 (0) prev_prio=0x78 (120) prev_state=0x0 (0) next_comm=systemd-
shutdow next_pid=0x1 (1) next_prio=0x78 (120)
These are the line from kern.log that show the longer delay:
2026-02-23T13:59:19.348451+01:00 lisa kernel: [ T146] amdgpu 0000:03:00.0: [drm] Cannot find any crtc or sizes
2026-02-23T14:02:13.817354+01:00 lisa kernel: [ T0] Linux version 6.19.0-trace (bert@lisa) (gcc (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian)
2.44) #1160 SMP PREEMPT_RT Sat Feb 21 00:22:46 CET 2026
So this time we have a trace that took about 107s and also a longer delay in kern.log.
The kern.log delay here is not the time it took for the reboot though, as the there might
have been a delay between the last log message of the old kernel and the reboot command.
From now on I'll reboot like this to get a proper timestamp in /var/log/kern.log:
# echo reboot > /dev/kmsg && reboot
Bert Karwatzki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-23 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <aQufmyZ7X7NdfiCL@slm.duckdns.org>
2026-02-19 16:46 ` ~90s reboot delay with v6.19 and PREEMPT_RT Bert Karwatzki
2026-02-19 20:53 ` Calvin Owens
2026-02-19 23:10 ` Bert Karwatzki
2026-02-20 0:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-02-20 9:15 ` ~90s shutdown " Bert Karwatzki
2026-02-20 15:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-02-23 0:35 ` Bert Karwatzki
2026-02-23 8:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-02-23 13:36 ` Bert Karwatzki [this message]
2026-02-23 23:36 ` Bert Karwatzki
2026-02-24 12:44 ` Bert Karwatzki
2026-02-24 12:58 ` Bert Karwatzki
2026-02-24 14:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-02-24 15:45 ` ~90s reboot " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-02-25 15:43 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-02-25 16:37 ` Bert Karwatzki
2026-02-25 16:59 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-02-25 22:31 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-02-26 13:24 ` Bert Karwatzki
2026-02-26 13:46 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-02-26 16:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-02-27 14:13 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-02-27 22:57 ` Bert Karwatzki
2026-03-02 11:15 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80f657156fb2d32d8fe246e65e9ac8bf9d7cfbd5.camel@web.de \
--to=spasswolf@web.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=calvin@wbinvd.org \
--cc=dschatzberg@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox