From: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] af_unix: Clean up unix_schedule_gc()
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 09:43:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875x2af6mq.fsf@yellow.woof> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260718062736.C97A31F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org>
sashiko-bot@kernel.org writes:
> [Severity: High]
> Does this call trigger the garbage collector for every exiting task in the
> system?
>
> If an unprivileged user creates a live AF_UNIX cyclic reference and leaves
> them open, while queueing a large number of normal inflight sockets up to
> RLIMIT_NOFILE, the live cycle causes unix_graph_state to persistently be
> UNIX_GRAPH_CYCLIC.
>
> Every task exit would then constantly queue unix_gc_work, which executes
> unix_walk_scc_fast() under the unix_gc_lock spinlock, iterating over all
> inflight sockets:
>
> net/unix/garbage.c:unix_walk_scc_fast() {
> ...
> while (!list_empty(&unix_unvisited_vertices)) {
> ...
> }
>
> Could this O(N) loop iterating over all inflight sockets while holding the
> unix_gc_lock cause severe lock contention and a system-wide performance
> degradation for any AF_UNIX operations like sendmsg and recvmsg that block
> on this lock?
Yes. But this is also a pre-existing issue. An unprivileged user can
already create a huge live circle, and then repeatedly create and close
a AF_UNIX socket which constantly schedules the garbage collector.
Perhaps we should think about a GC scheduling policy. Perhaps like other
garbage collector designs which get scheduled when memory runs low, or
maybe periodic? I can put this on my todo list.
Nam
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-17 6:27 [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] af_unix: Fix priority inversion issue Nam Cao
2026-07-17 6:27 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] af_unix: Schedule the garbage collector at task exit Nam Cao
2026-07-17 6:45 ` Nam Cao
2026-07-18 6:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 7:16 ` Nam Cao
2026-07-17 6:27 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] af_unix: Do not wait for garbage collector in sendmsg() Nam Cao
2026-07-18 6:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 7:26 ` Nam Cao
2026-07-17 6:27 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] af_unix: Clean up unix_schedule_gc() Nam Cao
2026-07-18 6:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 7:43 ` Nam Cao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875x2af6mq.fsf@yellow.woof \
--to=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox