From: "Mario Limonciello (AMD) (kernel.org)" <superm1@kernel.org>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Pass the policy to amd_pstate_update()
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 13:30:04 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8fb99491-093e-44e6-9227-8254ac8b51a6@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260106073608.278644-2-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
On 1/6/2026 1:36 AM, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> All callers of amd_pstate_update() already have a reference to the
> cpufreq_policy object.
>
> Pass the entire policy object and grab the cpudata using
> "policy->driver_data" instead of passing the cpudata and unnecessarily
> grabbing another read-side reference to the cpufreq policy object when
> it is already available in the caller.
>
> No functional changes intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 11 ++++-------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> index c45bc98721d2..5818a92d96b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> @@ -565,15 +565,12 @@ static inline bool amd_pstate_sample(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
> return true;
> }
>
> -static void amd_pstate_update(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata, u8 min_perf,
> +static void amd_pstate_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, u8 min_perf,
> u8 des_perf, u8 max_perf, bool fast_switch, int gov_flags)
> {
> - struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpudata->cpu);
> + struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = policy->driver_data;
> union perf_cached perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->perf);
>
> - if (!policy)
> - return;
> -
> /* limit the max perf when core performance boost feature is disabled */
> if (!cpudata->boost_supported)
> max_perf = min_t(u8, perf.nominal_perf, max_perf);
> @@ -675,7 +672,7 @@ static int amd_pstate_update_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> if (!fast_switch)
> cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(policy, &freqs);
>
> - amd_pstate_update(cpudata, perf.min_limit_perf, des_perf,
> + amd_pstate_update(policy, perf.min_limit_perf, des_perf,
> perf.max_limit_perf, fast_switch,
> policy->governor->flags);
>
> @@ -737,7 +734,7 @@ static void amd_pstate_adjust_perf(unsigned int cpu,
> if (max_perf < min_perf)
> max_perf = min_perf;
>
> - amd_pstate_update(cpudata, min_perf, des_perf, max_perf, true,
> + amd_pstate_update(policy, min_perf, des_perf, max_perf, true,
> policy->governor->flags);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-06 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-06 7:36 [RFC PATCH 0/2] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Prevent scheduling when atomic on PREEMPT_RT K Prateek Nayak
2026-01-06 7:36 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Pass the policy to amd_pstate_update() K Prateek Nayak
2026-01-06 19:30 ` Mario Limonciello (AMD) (kernel.org) [this message]
2026-01-06 7:36 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: Pass the policy to cpufreq_driver->adjust_perf() K Prateek Nayak
2026-01-06 19:31 ` Mario Limonciello (AMD) (kernel.org)
2026-01-07 4:49 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-01-07 5:08 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Prevent scheduling when atomic on PREEMPT_RT Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8fb99491-093e-44e6-9227-8254ac8b51a6@kernel.org \
--to=superm1@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=spasswolf@web.de \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox