From: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 13/18] net/sched: act_mirred: Move the recursion counter struct netdev_xmit.
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 18:14:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKa-r6s69JbQX7ZuGiz37bbfQYWs+r6odhVB7Ygct8DYN=ApJQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250309144653.825351-14-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
hi,
On Sun, Mar 9, 2025 at 3:48 PM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> mirred_nest_level is a per-CPU variable and relies on disabled BH for its
> locking. Without per-CPU locking in local_bh_disable() on PREEMPT_RT
> this data structure requires explicit locking.
>
> Move mirred_nest_level to struct netdev_xmit as u8, provide wrappers.
>
> Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
> Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
> Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
> include/linux/netdevice_xmit.h | 3 +++
> net/sched/act_mirred.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice_xmit.h b/include/linux/netdevice_xmit.h
> index 3bbbc1a9860a3..4793ec42b1faa 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice_xmit.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice_xmit.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ struct netdev_xmit {
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_DUP_NETDEV)
> u8 nf_dup_skb_recursion;
> #endif
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_ACT_MIRRED)
> + u8 sched_mirred_nest;
> +#endif
> };
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/net/sched/act_mirred.c b/net/sched/act_mirred.c
> index 5b38143659249..8d8cfac6cc6af 100644
> --- a/net/sched/act_mirred.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_mirred.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,29 @@ static LIST_HEAD(mirred_list);
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(mirred_list_lock);
>
> #define MIRRED_NEST_LIMIT 4
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, mirred_nest_level);
> +
> +#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> +static u8 tcf_mirred_nest_level_inc_return(void)
> +{
> + return __this_cpu_inc_return(softnet_data.xmit.sched_mirred_nest);
> +}
> +
> +static void tcf_mirred_nest_level_dec(void)
> +{
> + __this_cpu_dec(softnet_data.xmit.sched_mirred_nest);
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +static u8 tcf_mirred_nest_level_inc_return(void)
> +{
> + return current->net_xmit.nf_dup_skb_recursion++;
> +}
> +
> +static void tcf_mirred_nest_level_dec(void)
> +{
> + current->net_xmit.nf_dup_skb_recursion--;
> +}
> +#endif
sorry for reviewing this late - but shouldn't we use sched_mirred_nest
instead of nf_dup_skb_recursion in case CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is set?
thanks,
--
davide
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-21 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-09 14:46 [PATCH net-next 00/18] net: Cover more per-CPU storage with local nested BH locking Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-09 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next 01/18] net: page_pool: Don't recycle into cache on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-09 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next 02/18] net: dst_cache: Use nested-BH locking for dst_cache::cache Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-09 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next 03/18] ipv4/route: Use this_cpu_inc() for stats on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-09 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next 04/18] ipv6: sr: Use nested-BH locking for hmac_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-09 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next 05/18] xdp: Use nested-BH locking for system_page_pool Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-09 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next 06/18] netfilter: nf_dup{4, 6}: Move duplication check to task_struct Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-17 17:29 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-07 9:33 ` Juri Lelli
2025-03-09 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next 07/18] netfilter: nft_inner: Use nested-BH locking for nft_pcpu_tun_ctx Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-09 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next 08/18] netfilter: nf_dup_netdev: Move the recursion counter struct netdev_xmit Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-09 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next 09/18] xfrm: Use nested-BH locking for nat_keepalive_sk_ipv[46] Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-09 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next 10/18] openvswitch: Merge three per-CPU structures into one Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-17 17:34 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-03-17 17:38 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-03-09 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next 11/18] openvswitch: Use nested-BH locking for ovs_actions Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-10 14:17 ` [ovs-dev] " Ilya Maximets
2025-03-10 14:44 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-10 16:56 ` Ilya Maximets
2025-03-13 11:50 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-13 13:23 ` Ilya Maximets
2025-03-13 14:02 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-13 14:11 ` Aaron Conole
2025-03-09 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next 12/18] openvswitch: Move ovs_frag_data_storage into the struct ovs_action Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-09 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next 13/18] net/sched: act_mirred: Move the recursion counter struct netdev_xmit Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-21 17:14 ` Davide Caratti [this message]
2025-04-11 13:12 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-09 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next 14/18] net/sched: Use nested-BH locking for sch_frag_data_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-09 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next 15/18] mptcp: Use nested-BH locking for hmac_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-09 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next 16/18] rds: Disable only bottom halves in rds_page_remainder_alloc() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-09 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next 17/18] rds: Acquire per-CPU pointer within BH disabled section Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-03-09 14:46 ` [PATCH net-next 18/18] rds: Use nested-BH locking for rds_page_remainder Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKa-r6s69JbQX7ZuGiz37bbfQYWs+r6odhVB7Ygct8DYN=ApJQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dcaratti@redhat.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).