From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C5053385A0; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 16:19:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762359544; cv=none; b=ZC5Vou4/8aptBxYH4NjbbXwfoHwp1MrKLzwYpy+exmj8wGaY51vC+nFB4ihmEAydX/0o76pBL1wMQ5nXXuKgQ6DuJs0n5jTDuCaACtRPe3loLDiHwsT/uoVo4uHaqEiOsuUpj+LVB3TmG5RDJyiCbAmiUmXcI/VMqMSqYhsVERU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762359544; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NCcAa0pDfh+8ix09a1OPmKTAjDiOwhgcNW3yTAqYn9Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=k5n0Ba6X0UYv+HrNBzZeQexvjTPXUIUG2frkMYE9fjztJaQxJxMMptzQgEaLhlow205XTjSWdpsH5D14i0LWIPMFP1idBD8mWeWoJerlAd/TJngpu9WlW7MzsTpmnV2xWHpAi8RqajXjxQ1UF6va6Z06+gd2z1xY0CDs5Kj40fY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=hIS7pvJI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="hIS7pvJI" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 91FA7C2BCB0; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 16:19:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1762359543; bh=NCcAa0pDfh+8ix09a1OPmKTAjDiOwhgcNW3yTAqYn9Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=hIS7pvJIikT/daVfuiV6hOw8rowj5kF2jyQbPmqVAFcLSi/BrVw3VOFQj8kzc8LQZ BcEJjyvW51mn/gil4UEklR2UCI7uWz2xoeiwgAfIwwPnKAy/ClBPGF/Qx6MEs6DQnn fk5w3ty+2y3OhZ3BzMg0uhahAgno29sYHwIT0yJwUeNHjP1cxmUz2yweGOJmL5ARGE F8Y3XmHwKHl/HbDapWAEsr+p4YXenBiXqPsHNr/e5dBpT4m2GdekcoFdO+kTLUs0W9 e6KlIWXhRo4IbK2XzltdkrC1u4ykAP4tvHNHE8h8yAxmCcbVZF/awAFDG6g6V61wyx vfvp1Co3/C2CQ== Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 06:19:02 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Calvin Owens , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dan Schatzberg , Peter Zijlstra , Johannes Weiner , Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Koutn=FD?= , Clark Williams , Steven Rostedt , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH cgroup/for-6.19 1/2] cgroup: Convert css_set_lock from spinlock_t to raw_spinlock_t Message-ID: References: <20251104181114.489391-1-calvin@wbinvd.org> <20251105073009.xNtOAM_u@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251105073009.xNtOAM_u@linutronix.de> On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 08:30:09AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > This one has a kfree(link) and kfree takes spinlock_t so not working. ... > > I am also a bit worried about all these list iterations which happen > under the lock. There is no upper limit meaning the list can grow with > limits affecting the time the lock is held. Good points. Let me think of something else. Thanks. -- tejun