From: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, hughd@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, muchun.song@linux.dev,
david@redhat.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
imran.f.khan@oracle.com, kamalesh.babulal@oracle.com,
axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 04/26] mm: vmscan: refactor move_folios_to_lru()
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 17:46:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRRJe3PzN3cmgvcB@hyeyoo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251112074930.mKu1J__U@linutronix.de>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 08:49:30AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2025-11-11 08:44:14 [-0800], Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 09:49:00AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > On 2025-11-11 12:16:43 [+0900], Harry Yoo wrote:
> > > > > However, in the !CONFIG_HAVE_CMPXCHG_LOCAL case, mod_node_page_state()
> > > > > still calls local_irq_save(). Is this feasible in the PREEMPT_RT kernel?
> > > >
> > > > Hmm I was going to say it's necessary, but AFAICT we don't allocate
> > > > or free memory in hardirq context on PREEMPT_RT (that's the policy)
> > > > and so I'd say it's not necessary to disable IRQs.
> > > >
> > > > Sounds like we still want to disable IRQs only on !PREEMPT_RT on
> > > > such architectures?
> > > >
> > > > Not sure how seriously do PREEMPT_RT folks care about architectures
> > > > without HAVE_CMPXCHG_LOCAL. (riscv and loongarch have ARCH_SUPPORTS_RT
> > > > but doesn't have HAVE_CMPXCHG_LOCAL).
> > >
> > > We take things seriously and you shouldn't make assumption based on
> > > implementation. Either the API can be used as such or not.
> > > In case of mod_node_page_state(), the non-IRQ off version
> > > (__mod_node_page_state()) has a preempt_disable_nested() to ensure
> > > atomic update on PREEMPT_RT without disabling interrupts.
> >
> > Harry is talking about mod_node_page_state() on
> > !CONFIG_HAVE_CMPXCHG_LOCAL which is disabling irqs.
> >
> > void mod_node_page_state(struct pglist_data *pgdat, enum node_stat_item item,
> > long delta)
> > {
> > unsigned long flags;
> >
> > local_irq_save(flags);
> > __mod_node_page_state(pgdat, item, delta);
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> > }
> >
> > Is PREEMPT_RT fine with this?
>
> Yes.
> The local_irq_save() is not strictly needed but I am fine with it to
> keep it simple. The inner part is just counting.
Yeah I was wondering about this... and thanks for confirming!
--
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-12 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1761658310.git.zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
[not found] ` <97ea4728568459f501ddcab6c378c29064630bb9.1761658310.git.zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
2025-11-07 5:11 ` [PATCH v1 04/26] mm: vmscan: refactor move_folios_to_lru() Harry Yoo
2025-11-07 6:41 ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-07 13:20 ` Harry Yoo
2025-11-08 6:32 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-11-10 2:13 ` Harry Yoo
2025-11-10 4:30 ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-10 5:43 ` Harry Yoo
2025-11-10 6:11 ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-10 16:47 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-11-11 0:42 ` Harry Yoo
2025-11-11 3:04 ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-11 3:16 ` Harry Yoo
2025-11-11 3:23 ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-11 8:49 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-11-11 16:44 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-11-12 7:49 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-11-12 8:46 ` Harry Yoo [this message]
2025-11-12 8:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-11-12 15:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-11-11 3:17 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-11-11 3:24 ` Qi Zheng
2025-11-07 7:18 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aRRJe3PzN3cmgvcB@hyeyoo \
--to=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
--cc=kamalesh.babulal@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).