From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792435844; b=lnlTDueXXepBi4uCujEwet6HlDkik1cMOMP7wpMm1BaneSI1sWsxjMgzCzv4WWouYgik tFav7zoaIUloN/8+oqTCwOgJrd8t/WWOPQWSXdSWdAlurlOyecH5pXh00y5NHgGCGh55I Bl1AhOXveEBGdN7b6AnbhdP5vyy64NBOSDYsAc5TfWA0nA345zqUK4bQAA0CQzvKzBSvZ VEf4sa5PJ7KWfQ8KLWUlCZrZXIAPtvUqjGfSizGxDSdlRLc/SgZjTaisAvTlDFdIQMgm7 d9VQxxc6LYDGo1U8oAAOvQFmWLidGL0xOk6rNIG08S7D+2vUaaFNg8cljVR33HztXjA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792435844; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; bh=te7dnZaa4V08cysI53I143BMOqDKYxG1tFa7yKmC0QE=; b=xF81lrxrb+jpqzkwITwKJTLUDqts4mcyq8UxqPDh7BDGClJsV45SlU6KkpS7L9uXLssr idfyWMbT2OOiR9ZjX5jMxMJzxNx4OcOgz01GjusjXEJ8IImei36vg7qljJNKzHzmTGJEO LScFU8TcxzHs9e6Jwir4XCOa4ponufVYbSfSSF2yG7JactS8UbUwGK7C92DLRe4fNscF5 khyNjHn6NsUANRxuLp1kimLKuU32vYcVuZCCM2YpSc1MV9FhN7AxYhobFzBrx86AHLN5H DJfQyg3XAMKCfa5sKDeO81BX3m2ESmcEEISZ350KEwU6z8XBbhrEzjZBtcGA0YqRb9g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=S0scKJem; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81BC4606A319 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 18:50:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=S0scKJem Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF3741F000C4; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 18:50:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792435844; bh=te7dnZaa4V08cysI53I143BMOqDKYxG1tFa7yKmC0QE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=S0scKJemeKU+T2Qxtr+EjHGVNTXE82/CP6bfjmgJzjNuKFlzgsOlFVQLOnt8yv8Px Qrtj8kAgiIkKxDEnBZR7Y2CdwXKQPXLjeBWgiwqZYCgOCRP33/RNXWLwRZPOfVTNuP D0Tlp8gG8gJCTInQrDrhcxyOm7qDeM1InLHs4FdChayOXeK9KDPmvJD6ZG1OZfzdM3 4aYbV/T6nhCpnQ0XXwDnkeg3KTtvzKTkBC9CIvquQL3rS8Hhd8vwIdTHZ0y9P/JKrJ hNEI0UUo+DwucCTyPpiiVqxAAopYOPWsE35XdzEgZkscclhVqNXcJnuZEnyKJAAMpZ MLn0XYwPXZWtA== Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 13:50:42 -0500 From: Clark Williams To: Wen Yang Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Steven Rostedt , linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6-rt 0/5] net: Backport backlog-NAPI threads to resolve PREEMPT_RT softirq warning in SMP flush Message-ID: References: X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 12:40:48PM -0500, Clark Williams wrote: > Meh, 15 patches doesn't suck. I'll try and get to that tonight or > tomorrow and see if we can have both v6.6-rt-next and v6.1-rt-next > soaking. > > Clark > -- Wen, I was reading back through the threads and the previous series and am confused as to whether your 15-patch series has all the RPS code that's required. I seem to recall Sebastian indicating that the original v6.1-rt patchset needed some extra RPS bits? Clark -- The United States Coast Guard Ruining Natural Selection since 1790