From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794240924; b=z3vlXTbb7TqDS4/2FWZiSApbCaOe2K1KFWUNvKh/WoGqjyv1z5s16Ki3/wAYaABq5X4B OYiAuj93H0cep/ANPz1rdBWvSEvuJYHKXaG4RkXGpm/cKPXwImYCDY3xomQDvwmn4Vc6L XGJjdn7mygGbgpM2QV2XhPg4S7L/HtScP6WbIdY5GQTvTUB0gm0Ns5JnTowlBS7JoMU7s Io8OHmJK88Mt9Ap1f7yiic/P6kchRqBD/5+B0fkuca9QaXvWxU2XYTrkydHHudpn0RQ8S gf7gMSupTFBCcD8qf4ynnSH6kAQNv18x7/tnd0Oesb1ZPqFIVuZtGyNcDCqGYCoy9KA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794240924; h=DMARC-Filter:Date:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject: Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition: Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To; bh=MN1BnROEORvgYw+MypT4h2Jcvdysaix5bzeL3TZj7Ug=; b=tXE7IQLdrlOGMom9HHb8iMp1oOgQYcEpxI3dPHp9P1l2e6qh3pWJFVlfn2Zk8QidWd0+ aP37Y+Q7ycZNll4D/oNAYpv7/ZANM/YZXVR/e4kbliczp5q2e/nvk0QNYqc5R+pfL/d9c 9Wo3DVnz9iwVtFJzB5tUhl1j3E4HuVXlps4yN5sb0igFzY3HcNRjLHVKXGY3VeQIkrjf6 dhYYNeKBUMez5M0rfCGZscs+3BFshojLhDjC/8v1xKvW+38g/3frpRezkn5Qx3oJ0+0Mn xLJLlbsKQ0qsT3v4mIrwooU+TqsexvjZ+NUYWurvsCY8ENyLAcSYJ/xAQwWZA1mix/A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2020 header.b="Nxb/MLdA"; dkim=pass header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=2020e header.b=6Qx5XPOv; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=193.142.43.55 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F0B8606A32A for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2026 16:15:24 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 5F0B8606A32A Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2020 header.b=Nxb/MLdA; dkim=pass header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=2020e header.b=6Qx5XPOv Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 17:15:20 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1794240922; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MN1BnROEORvgYw+MypT4h2Jcvdysaix5bzeL3TZj7Ug=; b=Nxb/MLdAkBa8XsF9k4yN7JmmPWhb8eEZ4Wx0xAxLiQm4wV/EKdGA2b7vjyaEYTOj9rMTUv MULDhOcSoINy1O2FUxnboI/qdEKA2U44jWA5KkmARngPnZ132W1A2SZbdfpfpOx10h/M83 x1JW8Yc7fQCC+vBVYGuDDuxqa9jqH4WhTtzWe3Ql+gIsbBHY2mBDTm6sftmxRWdfGuQyUY yQ5ynwDKnwgsCHJrlGyi5gvzs3LPxm0CDYBMFQ89F2AB/+VXH2RXQcOZ8R7R+fBwX5fkDo 3YzGn7rbQESMqQdnk4EnrTUic1Sl+761RUJiDSpAbqOUgByyeGCFG5owA9EFpw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1794240922; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MN1BnROEORvgYw+MypT4h2Jcvdysaix5bzeL3TZj7Ug=; b=6Qx5XPOvhwNYptQdWHV4IOm3h9SuIai0MbKolYUcGGjW2585+syNcIkyAKHYlIuU84OMub McwTYs2bfaHtl1Dg== From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" To: Nathan Chancellor Cc: Julian Braha , Clark Williams , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Nicolas Schier , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Frederic Weisbecker , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jonathan Corbet , John Ogness , Derek Barbosa , Zbigniew =?utf-8?Q?J=C4=99drzejewski-Szmek?= , Daan De Meyer , Luca Boccassi , linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arighi@nvidia.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/10] tools: Introduce a kernel configuration checker Message-ID: References: <20261106091922.7560-1-darwi@linutronix.de> <20261109003745.GA3429615@ax162> X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20261109003745.GA3429615@ax162> On Sun, 08 Nov 2026, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 08, 2026 at 06:59:26PM +0000, Julian Braha wrote: > > I think the name will cause confusion. > > > > We already have some "kconfig checkers" in-tree, like > > scripts/kconfig-sym-check.pl > > > > But actually, your tool is quite unrelated, because that one checks > > 'Kconfig' source files, while yours checks the user's '.config' file. > > > > This has already caused some confusion in the past, for example in this > > thread [2], someone misunderstood which one 'kconfig-sym-check' > > actually checks. > > > > In addition to .config vs Kconfig, the name is similar to > > 'kconfig-sym-check', but is not as descriptive about *what kind* of > > checks it performs. > > Yeah, I had similar thoughts when this initially appeared in my inbox. > As you mentioned in your email, this is basically a policy checker (“we > need these configuration options enabled or disabled to meet our > requirements”), so maybe config-policy-checker or something like that > would be clearer? I would've loved to keep "kconfig" in the name so that outside the kernel, it's still clear it's about a kernel .config. For example, a Debian package for this tool can be called "kconfig-checker", "kconfig-policy-checker", etc. What about kconfig-audit? Something like: ./tools/kconfig-audit/audit.py -c .config -p PREEMPT_RT make POLICY=preempt_rt auditconfig config-policy-checker does sound good, but it feels verbose. Feedback appreciated. Thanks! -- Ahmed S. Darwish Linutronix GmbH