From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
dev@openvswitch.org, Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH net-next v4 07/15] openvswitch: Merge three per-CPU structures into one
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 10:13:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7ta57fe0uz.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250512092736.229935-8-bigeasy@linutronix.de> (Sebastian Andrzej Siewior's message of "Mon, 12 May 2025 11:27:28 +0200")
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> writes:
> exec_actions_level is a per-CPU integer allocated at compile time.
> action_fifos and flow_keys are per-CPU pointer and have their data
> allocated at module init time.
> There is no gain in splitting it, once the module is allocated, the
> structures are allocated.
>
> Merge the three per-CPU variables into ovs_pcpu_storage, adapt callers.
>
> Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
> Cc: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
> Cc: dev@openvswitch.org
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-14 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-12 9:27 [PATCH net-next v4 00/15] net: Cover more per-CPU storage with local nested BH locking Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 01/15] net: page_pool: Don't recycle into cache on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 02/15] net: dst_cache: Use nested-BH locking for dst_cache::cache Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 03/15] ipv4/route: Use this_cpu_inc() for stats on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 04/15] ipv6: sr: Use nested-BH locking for hmac_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 05/15] xdp: Use nested-BH locking for system_page_pool Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 06/15] xfrm: Use nested-BH locking for nat_keepalive_sk_ipv[46] Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 07/15] openvswitch: Merge three per-CPU structures into one Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-14 14:13 ` Aaron Conole [this message]
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 08/15] openvswitch: Use nested-BH locking for ovs_pcpu_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-14 14:14 ` [ovs-dev] " Aaron Conole
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 09/15] openvswitch: Move ovs_frag_data_storage into the struct ovs_pcpu_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-14 14:14 ` [ovs-dev] " Aaron Conole
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 10/15] net/sched: act_mirred: Move the recursion counter struct netdev_xmit Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-15 9:55 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-05-15 12:49 ` Juri Lelli
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 11/15] net/sched: Use nested-BH locking for sch_frag_data_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 12/15] mptcp: Use nested-BH locking for hmac_storage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 13/15] rds: Disable only bottom halves in rds_page_remainder_alloc() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 14/15] rds: Acquire per-CPU pointer within BH disabled section Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-12 9:27 ` [PATCH net-next v4 15/15] rds: Use nested-BH locking for rds_page_remainder Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-15 13:40 ` [PATCH net-next v4 00/15] net: Cover more per-CPU storage with local nested BH locking patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7ta57fe0uz.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).