linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ankita Garg <ankita@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RT] [PATCH] Make scheduler root_domain modular (sched_classspecific)
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:27:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1206271627.6437.100.camel@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080323090215.GA8082@in.ibm.com>

On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 14:32 +0530, Ankita Garg wrote:
> Hi Gregory,
> 
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 12:04:04PM -0600, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > >>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 10:29 AM, in message
> > <20080322142915.GA9478@in.ibm.com>, Ankita Garg <ankita@in.ibm.com> wrote: 
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > Thanks Gregory for clarifying my question on root_domains infrastructure. 
> > > What
> > > I was effectively mentioning on irc the other day was to make the 
> > > root_domain
> > > infrastructure modular, ie sched_class specific. Currently, only rt is 
> > > making
> > > use of this infrasture. Making it modular would enable ease of extension to
> > > other sched_classes if required. Trivial patch to that effect.
> > > 
> > > Patch compile and boot tested.
> > 
> > Hi Ankita,
> >   Very nice, thanks!  Couple of minor nits and further cleanup opportunities inline, but otherwise:
> >
> > Acked-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
> > 
> > > 
> The changes you have suggested are consistent with what we do for rt_rq
> and cfs_rq. Here is the patch with these modifications.

As this patch doesn't touch -rt specific code you should have provided a
patch against the upstream code in sched-devel/latest.

patching file kernel/sched.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 337.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 6337.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file kernel/sched.c
patching file kernel/sched_rt.c
Hunk #3 FAILED at 78.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 114.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 363.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 1005 (offset 406 lines).
Hunk #7 FAILED at 1169.
Hunk #8 FAILED at 1178.
5 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file kernel/sched_rt.c


> Signed-off-by: Ankita Garg <ankita@in.ibm.com> 
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.24.3-rt3/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24.3-rt3.orig/kernel/sched.c	2008-03-21 22:57:04.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.24.3-rt3/kernel/sched.c	2008-03-23 14:09:22.000000000 +0530
> @@ -337,22 +337,27 @@
>   * object.
>   *
>   */
> -struct root_domain {
> -	atomic_t refcount;
> -	cpumask_t span;
> -	cpumask_t online;
>  
> +struct rt_root_domain {
>  	/*
>  	 * The "RT overload" flag: it gets set if a CPU has more than
>  	 * one runnable RT task.
>  	 */
> -	cpumask_t rto_mask;
> -	atomic_t rto_count;
> +	cpumask_t overload_mask;
> +	atomic_t overload_count;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  	struct cpupri cpupri;
>  #endif
>  };
>  
> +struct root_domain {
> +	atomic_t refcount;
> +	cpumask_t span;
> +	cpumask_t online;
> +
> +	struct rt_root_domain rt;
> +};
> +
>  /*
>   * By default the system creates a single root-domain with all cpus as
>   * members (mimicking the global state we have today).
> @@ -6332,7 +6337,7 @@
>  	cpus_clear(rd->span);
>  	cpus_clear(rd->online);
>  
> -	cpupri_init(&rd->cpupri);
> +	cpupri_init(&rd->rt.cpupri);
>  
>  }
>  
> Index: linux-2.6.24.3-rt3/kernel/sched_rt.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24.3-rt3.orig/kernel/sched_rt.c	2008-03-21 22:57:04.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.24.3-rt3/kernel/sched_rt.c	2008-03-23 14:12:45.000000000 +0530
> @@ -7,12 +7,12 @@
>  
>  static inline int rt_overloaded(struct rq *rq)
>  {
> -	return atomic_read(&rq->rd->rto_count);
> +	return atomic_read(&rq->rd->rt.overload_count);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void rt_set_overload(struct rq *rq)
>  {
> -	cpu_set(rq->cpu, rq->rd->rto_mask);
> +	cpu_set(rq->cpu, rq->rd->rt.overload_mask);
>  	/*
>  	 * Make sure the mask is visible before we set
>  	 * the overload count. That is checked to determine
> @@ -21,14 +21,14 @@
>  	 * updated yet.
>  	 */
>  	wmb();
> -	atomic_inc(&rq->rd->rto_count);
> +	atomic_inc(&rq->rd->rt.overload_count);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void rt_clear_overload(struct rq *rq)
>  {
>  	/* the order here really doesn't matter */
> -	atomic_dec(&rq->rd->rto_count);
> -	cpu_clear(rq->cpu, rq->rd->rto_mask);
> +	atomic_dec(&rq->rd->rt.overload_count);
> +	cpu_clear(rq->cpu, rq->rd->rt.overload_mask);
>  }
>  
>  static void update_rt_migration(struct rq *rq)
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  	if (p->prio < rq->rt.highest_prio) {
>  		rq->rt.highest_prio = p->prio;
> -		cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu, p->prio);
> +		cpupri_set(&rq->rd->rt.cpupri, rq->cpu, p->prio);
>  	}
>  	if (p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
>  		rq->rt.rt_nr_migratory++;
> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@
>  	}
>  
>  	if (rq->rt.highest_prio != highest_prio)
> -		cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu, rq->rt.highest_prio);
> +		cpupri_set(&rq->rd->rt.cpupri, rq->cpu, rq->rt.highest_prio);
>  
>  	update_rt_migration(rq);
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@
>  {
>  	int count;
>  
> -	count = cpupri_find(&task_rq(task)->rd->cpupri, task, lowest_mask);
> +	count = cpupri_find(&task_rq(task)->rd->rt.cpupri, task, lowest_mask);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * cpupri cannot efficiently tell us how many bits are set, so it only
> @@ -599,7 +599,7 @@
>  
>  	next = pick_next_task_rt(this_rq);
>  
> -	for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, this_rq->rd->rto_mask) {
> +	for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, this_rq->rd->rt.overload_mask) {
>  		if (this_cpu == cpu)
>  			continue;
>  
> @@ -763,7 +763,7 @@
>  	if (rq->rt.overloaded)
>  		rt_set_overload(rq);
>  
> -	cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu, rq->rt.highest_prio);
> +	cpupri_set(&rq->rd->rt.cpupri, rq->cpu, rq->rt.highest_prio);
>  }
>  
>  /* Assumes rq->lock is held */
> @@ -772,7 +772,7 @@
>  	if (rq->rt.overloaded)
>  		rt_clear_overload(rq);
>  
> -	cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu, CPUPRI_INVALID);
> +	cpupri_set(&rq->rd->rt.cpupri, rq->cpu, CPUPRI_INVALID);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-23 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-22 14:29 [RT] [PATCH] Make scheduler root_domain modular (sched_class specific) Ankita Garg
2008-03-22 18:04 ` [RT] [PATCH] Make scheduler root_domain modular (sched_classspecific) Gregory Haskins
2008-03-23  9:02   ` Ankita Garg
2008-03-23 11:27     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-03-23 11:37       ` Ankita Garg
2008-03-23 11:53         ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1206271627.6437.100.camel@lappy \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=ankita@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).