[PATCH]sched: fix typo in sched-rt-group.txt file

[GeunSik Lim <leemgs1@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1868 bytes --]




Dear Ingo,

I found typo about the range of static priority ( = realtime priority )
in "./Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt" file.

If I don't understand static priority levels, Correct me.


commit d6af702008117ca489a2f5476239d1688a517e98
Author: GeunSik,Lim <leemgs1@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue May 12 17:20:32 2009 +0900

    sched: fix typo in sched-rt-group.txt file
    
    Fix typo about static priority's range.
     Kernel Space priority: 0   to 99   --> User Space RT priority 99 to 0
     Kernel Space priority: 100 to 139  --> User Space nice -20 to 19
    
    Signed-off-by: GeunSik Lim <geunsik.lim@samsung.com>

diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt
index 5ba4d3f..1537146 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ get their allocated time.
 
 Implementing SCHED_EDF might take a while to complete. Priority Inheritance is
 the biggest challenge as the current linux PI infrastructure is geared towards
-the limited static priority levels 0-139. With deadline scheduling you need to
+the limited static priority levels 0-99. With deadline scheduling you need to
 do deadline inheritance (since priority is inversely proportional to the
 deadline delta (deadline - now).
 


-----------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-***" 
in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

GeunSik Lim (ELS - OS Group - S/W Lab - SAIT - SAMSUNG)
e-Mail  :1) geunsik.lim@samsung.com
         2) leemgs@gmail.com , leemgs1@gmail.com
HomePage: http://intomail.dnip.net/invain/me/
-----------------------------------------------

[-- Attachment #2: fix-typo-static-priority-levels.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1138 bytes --]

commit d6af702008117ca489a2f5476239d1688a517e98
Author: GeunSik,Lim <leemgs1@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue May 12 17:20:32 2009 +0900

    sched: fix typo in sched-rt-group.txt file
    
    Fix typo about static priority's range.
     Kernel Space priority: 0   to 99   --> User Space RT priority 99 to 0
     Kernel Space priority: 100 to 139  --> User Space nice -20 to 19
    
    Signed-off-by: GeunSik Lim <geunsik.lim@samsung.com>

diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt
index 5ba4d3f..1537146 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ get their allocated time.
 
 Implementing SCHED_EDF might take a while to complete. Priority Inheritance is
 the biggest challenge as the current linux PI infrastructure is geared towards
-the limited static priority levels 0-139. With deadline scheduling you need to
+the limited static priority levels 0-99. With deadline scheduling you need to
 do deadline inheritance (since priority is inversely proportional to the
 deadline delta (deadline - now).