From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: RFC: THE OFFLINE SCHEDULER Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:14:20 +0200 Message-ID: <1251440060.18584.103.camel@twins> References: <1251282598.3514.20.camel@raz> <1251297910.1791.22.camel@maxim-laptop> <1251298443.4791.7.camel@raz> <1251300625.18584.18.camel@twins> <1251302598.18584.31.camel@twins> <20090826180407.GA13632@elte.hu> <20090826193252.GA14721@elte.hu> <20090826135041.e6169d18.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4A95A5EE.90400@nortel.com> <1251322663.3882.48.camel@raz> <4A96B997.1070001@nortel.com> <4A97071F.5070804@novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Christoph Lameter , Chris Friesen , raz ben yehuda , Andrew Morton , mingo@elte.hu, maximlevitsky@gmail.com, efault@gmx.de, riel@redhat.com, wiseman@macs.biu.ac.il, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org To: Gregory Haskins Return-path: Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:36327 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751079AbZH1GQG (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:16:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A97071F.5070804@novell.com> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 18:22 -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote: > I wonder if it makes sense to do something along the lines of the > sched-class... Disabling the tick isn't a big deal from the scheduler's point of view, its all the other accounting crap that happens.