linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
	"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@redhat.com>,
	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] lockdep: Make MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES configurable.
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:24:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1271852671.1776.101.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1004211407510.4506@localhost.localdomain>

On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:12 +0200, John Kacur wrote:
> 
>  lock-classes:                         1330 [max: 8191]
>  direct dependencies:                 12754 [max: 16384]
>  indirect dependencies:               33245
>  all direct dependencies:             49074
>  dependency chains:                   19641 [max: 32768]

Right, so each dependency also gets a stack trace, see
add_lock_to_list().

>  dependency chain hlocks:             73246 [max: 163840]
>  in-hardirq chains:                      25
>  in-softirq chains:                       0
>  in-process chains:                   19616
>  stack-trace entries:                262144 [max: 262144]
> 
> 
> I'm looking at more details in /proc/lockdep and friends to see if
> I can find any more details, or something that looks amiss.
> 
It might be useful to add a counter that simply counts all save_trace()
invocations, and maybe split them out according to new_bit in
mark_lock().

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-21 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-16 11:45 [RFC: PATCH] lockdep: Make MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES configurable John Kacur
2010-04-16 15:29 ` [RFC: PATCH v2] " John Kacur
2010-04-19 16:51   ` John Kacur
2010-04-20 21:09     ` Andrew Morton
2010-04-21 11:12       ` [PATCH v3] " John Kacur
2010-04-21 11:37         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-21 11:47           ` Gregory Haskins
2010-04-21 12:03             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-21 12:12           ` John Kacur
2010-04-21 12:24             ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-04-21 14:53             ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
     [not found] <4BCEB92D0200005A0006515F@soto.provo.novell.com>
2010-04-21 12:37 ` Gregory Haskins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1271852671.1776.101.camel@laptop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
    --cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=lgoncalv@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).