From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich Subject: Re: At a loss: Kernel 2.6.19-rt15 with ixp425 Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 19:25:22 -0700 Message-ID: <1276136722.4686.1.camel@sven.thebigcorporation.com> References: <20100608181752.GA19521@colorado.edu> <1276022232.9420.17.camel@sven.thebigcorporation.com> <20100608193204.GA13883@colorado.edu> <1276102964.8203.7.camel@sven.thebigcorporation.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eric W Anderson , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org To: Xianghua Xiao Return-path: Received: from mail-pz0-f176.google.com ([209.85.222.176]:52269 "EHLO mail-pz0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932219Ab0FJCZ0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2010 22:25:26 -0400 Received: by pzk6 with SMTP id 6so3360174pzk.1 for ; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 19:25:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 13:50 -0500, Xianghua Xiao wrote: > while upgrading to newer kernel sounds great, which I just did(from > 2.6.18rt to 2.6.33rt), the newer kernel sometimes does not perform as > well as older ones(plus it's also bloated), esp in embedded products. > In my case, we got a slower product with the newer kernel, the 'worse' > performance happened immediately when CFS was added. Even after a long > time debugging and tweaking, it's still there. > > xianghua I am sure if you provided some specific code or performance data to substantiate that regression someone here (or on LKML) would take interest. Regards Sven