From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6: v4] lockdep: Make MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES configurable. Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:35:19 +0200 Message-ID: <1276763719.27822.3.camel@twins> References: <1276554087-3632-1-git-send-email-jkacur@redhat.com> <1276554087-3632-3-git-send-email-jkacur@redhat.com> <1276714154.1745.623.camel@laptop> <1276723008.2077.9574.camel@twins> <1276723773.3556.65.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: John Kacur , Thomas Gleixner , lkml , rt-users , Clark Williams , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ingo Molnar , Sven-Thorsten Dietrich , ghaskins@novell.com To: rostedt@goodmis.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1276723773.3556.65.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 17:29 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 23:16 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > Also, google doesn't seem to index msg-ids, so I've no idea what you're > > referring to. > > But marc.info does: > > http://marc.info/?i=4BCEAD7B0200005A0006513E@soto.provo.novell.com Right, so that was before Yong Zhang's patch, if it still happens we need to again look at what is causing this. Again, blindly increasing the limit is not a good option.