From: "Philipp Überbacher" <hollunder@lavabit.com>
To: linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: future of -rt kernels for realtime audio
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:53:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1278444945-sup-9886@eris> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikZNjYJnDM6iKgrT1230FP8DSMgHUrZz2lYL4ll@mail.gmail.com>
Excerpts from Pedro Ribeiro's message of 2010-07-06 13:19:31 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> I've been using -rt kernels since 2.6.29 because I do realtime audio
> on my laptop.
>
> The audio stability has been steadily improving since, and now I find
> that I can use 2.6.34 without the -rt patch and achieve the same
> stability as 2.6.33-rt - well, my latency requirements aren't that
> high, I just need to maintain 8.9ms completely stable, however before
> .34 it would be impossible without the -rt patch.
>
> So out of curiosity, what changed for .34? According to [1], on .33
> Raw Spinlock Annotation was introduced in the mainline kernel.
> However, as said above, I can't get the same performance than with
> .34.
>
> I remember that I read somewhere that the one the biggest problems
> with latency requirements was the use of the BKL. Do you think there
> will be a significant improvement of latency (in specific cases of
> course) with the scheduled removal of BKL for 2.6.36?
>
> Thanks for the help,
> Pedro
>
> [1] http://www.osadl.org/Realtime-Linux.projects-realtime-linux.0.html
Ah, nice to hear that the BKL removal is scheduled. Pretty much all I
know is that Linus set the BKL removal as precondition for preempt-rt to
be merged with mainline.
I guess this means that preempt-rt could disappear in some post-.36
version. I won't hold my breath.
Anyway, the stock kernel has been good for a while, but there are some
cases where I still experience big differences. Some, mostly audio
unrelated, actions or kinds of load cause lots of xruns with the stock
kernel and none with -rt. Prime example for me is xrandr, enable an
external monitor -> xruns, not so with -rt. There are a couple of other
cases. It's mostly about this kind of stuff, the achievable latency is
pretty much the same in my experience (which is only with an USB
interface).
--
Regards,
Philipp
--
"Wir stehen selbst enttäuscht und sehn betroffen / Den Vorhang zu und alle Fragen offen." Bertolt Brecht, Der gute Mensch von Sezuan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-06 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-06 11:19 future of -rt kernels for realtime audio Pedro Ribeiro
2010-07-06 11:49 ` Robin Gareus
2010-07-06 15:45 ` Mark Knecht
2010-07-06 19:53 ` Philipp Überbacher [this message]
2010-07-06 20:44 ` Pedro Ribeiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1278444945-sup-9886@eris \
--to=hollunder@lavabit.com \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).