From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] futex: free_pi_state outside of hb->lock sections Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 06:46:03 -0400 Message-ID: <1278931563.1537.184.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> References: <1278714780-788-1-git-send-email-dvhltc@us.ibm.com> <1278714780-788-4-git-send-email-dvhltc@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: rostedt@goodmis.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Darren Hart , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Eric Dumazet , John Kacur , Mike Galbraith , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Gleixner Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 12:35 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jul 2010, Darren Hart wrote: > > > free_pi_state() calls kfree() and might sleep. To prepare for raw hb->locks, > > get the calls to free_pi_state() out of the hb->lock() sections. > > > > Signed-off-by: Darren Hart > > struct task_struct *task; > > - spinlock_t *lock_ptr; > > + raw_spinlock_t *lock_ptr; > > How is this related to the changelog ? Read the reply to himself (V2) ;-) -- Steve