From: Pedro Gonnet <gonnet@maths.ox.ac.uk>
To: dmarkh@cfl.rr.com
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question regarding pthread_cond_wait/pthread_cond_signal latencies
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 21:51:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1306011102.10494.34.camel@laika> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DD82514.3070407@cfl.rr.com>
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 16:48 -0400, Mark Hounschell wrote:
> On 05/20/2011 06:08 AM, Pedro Gonnet wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I'm currently working on a shared-memory parallel Molecular Dynamics
> > simulation library (http://mdcore.sourceforge.net/) geared towards
> > multi-core systems.
> >
> > The library uses pthreads (plus some OpenMP for some simple loops) and
> > uses pthread_cond_wait and pthread_cond_signal to coordinate a group of
> > worker threads.
> >
> > I've been profiling the library on different machines and kernels and
> > have noticed that in many cases there are significant (several ms,
> > measured with Intel's Vtune-thing) lags between calls to
> > pthread_cond_signal and the waiting thread actually getting back to
> > work.
> >
> > I've tried the Ubuntu -rt and -preempt kernels, and the whole simulation
> > runs twice as slowly, despite following the advice given here:
> >
> > https://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/HOWTO:_Build_an_RT-application
> >
> > My question is the following: which kernel (or set of configuration
> > options) will minimize these latencies? And if linux-rt is the answer,
> > in what ways do I have to be careful when porting the simulation for
> > this kernel?
> >
>
> Are you saying several ms latency from pthread_cond_signal to waking up a
> thread in pthread_cond_wait?
>
Yes. Or at least, this is what Vtune says. It could also be a fluke in
Vtune, but I would still be interested in knowing what kernel or what
kernel options can make these operations as fast as possible.
Cheers, Pedro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-21 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-20 10:08 Question regarding pthread_cond_wait/pthread_cond_signal latencies Pedro Gonnet
2011-05-21 20:48 ` Mark Hounschell
2011-05-21 20:51 ` Pedro Gonnet [this message]
2011-05-21 21:40 ` Rolando Martins
2011-05-22 0:44 ` Peter W. Morreale
2011-05-22 11:34 ` Pedro Gonnet
2011-05-22 13:51 ` Peter W. Morreale
2011-05-22 18:37 ` Robert Schwebel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-20 11:15 Pedro Gonnet
2011-05-22 14:53 ` Armin Steinhoff
2011-05-22 15:18 ` Armin Steinhoff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1306011102.10494.34.camel@laika \
--to=gonnet@maths.ox.ac.uk \
--cc=dmarkh@cfl.rr.com \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox