* Re: State of Linux-RT Patches and full inclusion into linus tree
[not found] <1449505.pSCLrkaxpL@segfault.sh0n.net>
@ 2011-07-11 4:46 ` Bryan Donlan
2011-07-11 5:43 ` jordan
2011-07-11 12:54 ` Jonathan Corbet
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bryan Donlan @ 2011-07-11 4:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shawn Starr; +Cc: linux-kernel, RT
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 20:43, Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if (or ever) will the full Linux RT patches be merged into
> Linus's tree? If not, what is preventing this? I know bits of this has been
> leaking into 2.6.x over the years.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn.
(adding CC for linux-rt-users)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: State of Linux-RT Patches and full inclusion into linus tree
2011-07-11 4:46 ` State of Linux-RT Patches and full inclusion into linus tree Bryan Donlan
@ 2011-07-11 5:43 ` jordan
2011-07-11 12:54 ` Jonathan Corbet
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jordan @ 2011-07-11 5:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bryan Donlan; +Cc: Shawn Starr, linux-kernel, RT
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 20:43, Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was wondering if (or ever) will the full Linux RT patches be merged into
>> Linus's tree? If not, what is preventing this? I know bits of this has been
>> leaking into 2.6.x over the years.
One of the key parts of the RT patchset, is already mainline - and was
merged in 2.6.39. - Forced Interrupt Threading. it can be enabled in
the kernel config. From what i understand there are other bits and
pieces to the RT patchset. But this was the most significant.. it is
certainly mainline and has been available for quite a while now. I am
typing from a computer that has it enabled, as i write to you now.
myself, i used RT for proaudio ~ i do not require RT anymore, at all.
my applications always meet their 'deadlines' with very low-latency
and work the way they are supposed too.
someone else can clarify on the bits of RT are still to be merged, as
i don't know. i just remember someone talking about that a few months
ago on the list. maybe that has changed. I had also read there was
supposed to be another RT release, but your posting is the first on
this list in a long time.
jordan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: State of Linux-RT Patches and full inclusion into linus tree
2011-07-11 4:46 ` State of Linux-RT Patches and full inclusion into linus tree Bryan Donlan
2011-07-11 5:43 ` jordan
@ 2011-07-11 12:54 ` Jonathan Corbet
2011-07-17 13:58 ` Bob Ham
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Corbet @ 2011-07-11 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bryan Donlan; +Cc: Shawn Starr, linux-kernel, RT
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:46:31 -0400
Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 20:43, Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was wondering if (or ever) will the full Linux RT patches be merged into
> > Linus's tree? If not, what is preventing this? I know bits of this has been
> > leaking into 2.6.x over the years.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shawn.
>
> (adding CC for linux-rt-users)
Thomas gave a talk on this subject back in April:
http://lwn.net/Articles/440064/
jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: State of Linux-RT Patches and full inclusion into linus tree
2011-07-11 12:54 ` Jonathan Corbet
@ 2011-07-17 13:58 ` Bob Ham
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bob Ham @ 2011-07-17 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Corbet; +Cc: Bryan Donlan, Shawn Starr, linux-kernel, RT
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 632 bytes --]
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 06:54 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:46:31 -0400
> Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 20:43, Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com> wrote:
> > > I was wondering if (or ever) will the full Linux RT patches be merged into
> > > Linus's tree?
> Thomas gave a talk on this subject back in April:
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/440064/
That article contains the following sentence:
"There are plans to update to 2.6.38 soon."
Just out of curiosity, is that update under way?
--
Bob Ham <rah@bash.sh>
for (;;) { ++pancakes; }
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-17 14:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1449505.pSCLrkaxpL@segfault.sh0n.net>
2011-07-11 4:46 ` State of Linux-RT Patches and full inclusion into linus tree Bryan Donlan
2011-07-11 5:43 ` jordan
2011-07-11 12:54 ` Jonathan Corbet
2011-07-17 13:58 ` Bob Ham
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).