From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Rolando Martins <rolando.martins@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt6
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:34:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1312194842.8233.88.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABcS5h0m10aWDuK5fK4C-mzMMwLyXJ_cehoTgWFutvPPrv30HQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 09:42 +0100, Rolando Martins wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> is there any progress on the CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED front?
Out of curiosity, why would you want that in a -rt kernel?
(I haven't done any PI testing with that, but I can imagine the throttle
causing heartburn)
-Mike
> I don't know if this is related, but in 33-rt if I used a low (=100)
> cpu_runtime_us and cpu_period_us then I would get some freezes
> (something that does not happen in 2.6.39).
(providing a realtime budget of 100 whole microseconds to a kernel where
everything and it's brother is realtime is unlikely to go well)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-01 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-28 21:43 [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt6 Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-28 22:33 ` Madovsky
2011-07-28 23:33 ` Peter W. Morreale
2011-07-29 0:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-29 6:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-07-29 14:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-29 15:57 ` [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt6 (kgdb working) Darren Hart
2011-07-30 15:49 ` [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt6 Remy Bohmer
2011-07-30 20:21 ` Remy Bohmer
2011-08-07 10:44 ` Remy Bohmer
2011-08-01 8:42 ` Rolando Martins
2011-08-01 10:34 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2011-08-01 10:45 ` Rolando Martins
2011-08-01 11:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-01 11:10 ` Rolando Martins
2011-08-04 6:34 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2011-08-04 9:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-04 19:05 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2011-08-04 20:15 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-08-05 9:28 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-08-05 16:03 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2011-08-08 17:25 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2011-08-04 16:34 ` [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt6 : BUG at kernel/trmutex.c:724! Tim Sander
2011-08-04 16:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-04 17:04 ` Tim Sander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1312194842.8233.88.camel@marge.simson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rolando.martins@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox