From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.1-rt11 Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 06:23:41 +0200 Message-ID: <1313295821.6334.5.camel@marge.simson.net> References: <1313232790.25267.7.camel@twins> <1313236135.4486.10.camel@marge.simson.net> <1313236713.25267.10.camel@twins> <1313243965.4486.36.camel@marge.simson.net> <20110813162735.GA2650@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel , Thomas Gleixner , linux-rt-users To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Return-path: Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:33473 "HELO mailout-de.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750736Ab1HNEXx (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2011 00:23:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110813162735.GA2650@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 09:27 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Strange. By the time it got around to printing the stall, no one was > stalling: > > [ 100.409012] INFO: rcu_preempt_state detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 21, t=60002 jiffies) > > Now it -is- possible for the stall to end just as we get ready to detect > it, but that window is really really small. The most recent occurrence > of this sort of thing was due misconfigured timekeeping, but I don't see > any sign of that in the trace. > > This happens repeatedly? Yeah. When I put -rt9 on the UV box, it was doing the just idling, and boom thing I saw with earlier releases on both my Q6600 and x3550 M3 boxes. -rt10 seems to have just changed the timing. I'll update the x3550 M3, and see if it still gripes. UV isn't virgin source, has to be twiddled a little. (symptom was identical though) -Mike