From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Subject: [PATCH -rt] ipc/sem: Rework semaphore wakeups
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:57:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1315994224.5040.1.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1315927699.6445.6.camel@marge.simson.net>
Subject: ipc/sem: Rework semaphore wakeups
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Tue Sep 13 15:09:40 CEST 2011
Current sysv sems have a weird ass wakeup scheme that involves keeping
preemption disabled over a potential O(n^2) loop and busy waiting on
that on other CPUs.
Kill this and simply wake the task directly from under the sem_lock.
This was discovered by a migrate_disable() debug feature that
disallows:
spin_lock();
preempt_disable();
spin_unlock()
preempt_enable();
Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
ipc/sem.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
Index: linux-rt/ipc/sem.c
===================================================================
--- linux-rt.orig/ipc/sem.c
+++ linux-rt/ipc/sem.c
@@ -415,6 +415,13 @@ static int try_atomic_semop (struct sem_
static void wake_up_sem_queue_prepare(struct list_head *pt,
struct sem_queue *q, int error)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_BASE
+ struct task_struct *p = q->sleeper;
+ get_task_struct(p);
+ q->status = error;
+ wake_up_process(p);
+ put_task_struct(p);
+#else
if (list_empty(pt)) {
/*
* Hold preempt off so that we don't get preempted and have the
@@ -426,6 +433,7 @@ static void wake_up_sem_queue_prepare(st
q->pid = error;
list_add_tail(&q->simple_list, pt);
+#endif
}
/**
@@ -439,6 +447,7 @@ static void wake_up_sem_queue_prepare(st
*/
static void wake_up_sem_queue_do(struct list_head *pt)
{
+#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_BASE
struct sem_queue *q, *t;
int did_something;
@@ -451,6 +460,7 @@ static void wake_up_sem_queue_do(struct
}
if (did_something)
preempt_enable();
+#endif
}
static void unlink_queue(struct sem_array *sma, struct sem_queue *q)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-14 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-10 9:12 [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.4-rt13 Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-10 17:27 ` Rolando Martins
2011-09-11 10:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-11 17:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-12 7:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-12 8:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-12 9:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-12 13:52 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-12 14:53 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-13 13:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 15:17 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-13 15:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-13 15:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-13 16:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-21 10:17 ` rt14: strace -> migrate_disable_atomic imbalance Mike Galbraith
2011-09-21 17:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-21 18:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-22 4:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-22 6:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-22 8:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-22 10:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-22 11:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-22 12:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-22 13:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-22 14:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-22 15:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-22 14:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-22 14:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-22 14:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-22 14:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-22 14:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-22 11:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-22 11:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-22 14:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-09-22 15:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-14 9:57 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-09-14 13:02 ` [PATCH -rt] ipc/sem: Rework semaphore wakeups Mike Galbraith
2011-09-14 18:48 ` Manfred Spraul
2011-09-14 19:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-15 17:04 ` Manfred Spraul
2011-09-12 10:04 ` [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.4-rt13 Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-12 11:33 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-11 18:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-12 7:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-12 8:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-12 8:43 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1315994224.5040.1.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).