From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: [RFC] [PATCH -rt 0/5] patchset focusing on cpu hotplug
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:56:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1318762607-2261-1-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com> (raw)
When tring cpu hotplug, I get some warning. And these patches
are tring to fix them up.
BTW, I have marked some of them as RFC:
patch#3: printk: don't call printk_tick in printk_needs_cpu()
I don't think we need to call printk_tick() even in mainline
kernel, fix me if I'm wrong.
patch#5: cpufreq: get rid of get_online_cpus()/put_online_cpus
IMHO, it's about lockdep false positive, but it's a little
annoying. Maybe there is other way to fix it up.
And the side effect is we introduce more latency than before
though it's rare path.
More details in eatch patch :)
Thanks,
Yong
---
Yong Zhang (5):
hotplug: sync_unplug: No '\n' in task name
hotplug: Call cpu_unplug_begin() a little early
printk: don't call printk_tick in printk_needs_cpu()
workqueue: hotplug fix
cpufreq: get rid of get_online_cpus()/put_online_cpus
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 20 +++++++-------------
kernel/cpu.c | 18 ++++++++----------
kernel/printk.c | 4 ++--
kernel/workqueue.c | 12 ++++++++----
4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2011-10-16 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-16 10:56 Yong Zhang [this message]
2011-10-16 10:56 ` [PATCH -rt 1/5] hotplug: sync_unplug: No '\n' in task name Yong Zhang
2011-10-16 10:56 ` [PATCH -rt 2/5] hotplug: Call cpu_unplug_begin() a little early Yong Zhang
2011-10-16 10:56 ` [RFC] [PATCH -rt 3/5] printk: don't call printk_tick in printk_needs_cpu() Yong Zhang
2011-10-16 10:56 ` [PATCH -rt 4/5] workqueue: hotplug fix Yong Zhang
2011-10-19 7:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-24 2:26 ` Yong Zhang
2011-10-24 9:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-16 10:56 ` [RFC] [PATCH -rt 5/5] cpufreq: get rid of get_online_cpus()/put_online_cpus() Yong Zhang
2011-10-19 9:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-24 2:44 ` Yong Zhang
2011-10-24 9:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-24 11:30 ` Yong Zhang
2011-10-24 11:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-24 11:56 ` Yong Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1318762607-2261-1-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
--to=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).