From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.14-rt31 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:51:48 -0500 Message-ID: <1326498708.7642.128.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> References: <1324525237.5916.114.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1326376484.7642.65.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <201201121757.25467.tim.sander@hbm.com> <201201131042.08323.tim.sander@hbm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Tim Sander , LKML , RT , Thomas Gleixner , Clark Williams , John Kacur To: Bernardo Barros Return-path: Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:37221 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751195Ab2AMXvv (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:51:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 10:45 -0800, Bernardo Barros wrote: > Will 3.0-rt continue to receive bugfixes in parallel with 3.2-rt? Will > it be a LTS kernel as 3.0 is? Yes, I will still be maintaining it. But as with mainline stable, there's some rules I follow. I do not add any patch that is not yet in 3.2-rt (or whatever is the latest rt), Linux mainline, or Linux stable. A patch must be in one of the above before I add it. With the exception if the patch only pertains to fix a bug in 3.0-rt and that code no longer exists in 3.2-rt. -- Steve