From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: Suggesting to include timerfd patch Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:15:09 -0500 Message-ID: <1328678109.2200.116.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Gleixner , linux-rt-users To: Sankara Muthukrishnan Return-path: Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.124]:35004 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750846Ab2BHFPL (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2012 00:15:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 22:56 -0600, Sankara Muthukrishnan wrote: > Steven, > > Could you please include the patch that Thomas suggested for the > timerfd hangs in the email thread (link below), if Thomas is fine with > the patch? I did verify that that patch fixed the hangs that I saw on > a panda board (ARM Cortex A9 dual core). > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-rt-users&m=132753755612168&w=2 > Hi Sankara, I follow the same stable rules that the stable mainline follows. I will not add any patch to the stable release that is not in either mainline, or in Thomas's -rt development branch. This keeps the stable tree from forking and getting a fix that is not upstream. A fix to stable that is not included upstream, may be forgotten about. If Thomas adds it, or if this patch is in mainline (which it is obviously not, as it is -rt specific), then I will be happy to apply it. Thanks, -- Steve